Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MBCGX vs RGAGX
MBCGX vs RGAGX Comparison
Open Charts MBCGX vs RGAGX
MBCGX vs RGAGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MBCGX vs. RGAGX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MBCGX is a Hold and RGAGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAGX has more cash in the bank: 361B vs. MBCGX (1.91B). RGAGX pays higher dividends than MBCGX: RGAGX (0.51) vs MBCGX (0.00). MBCGX was incepted earlier than RGAGX: MBCGX (25 years) vs RGAGX (17 years). MBCGX (1.16) is less costly to investors than RGAGX (0.29). RGAGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. MBCGX (14.00). RGAGX has a lower initial minimum investment than MBCGX: RGAGX (250) vs MBCGX (1000). RGAGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.55 vs. MBCGX (-29.02). RGAGX return over 5 years is better than : 20.99 vs. MBCGX (-54.93).
| MBCGX | RGAGX | MBCGX / RGAGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.16 | 0.29 | 400% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.16 | 0.29 | 400% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.927 | 8.887 | -10% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.91B | 361B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.51 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -29.02 | 12.55 | -231% |
| Returns for 3 years | -27.39 | 50.34 | -54% |
| Returns for 5 years | -54.93 | 20.99 | -262% |
| Returns for 10 years | -1.89 | 122.10 | -2% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement