Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MBCGX vs RGAGX
MBCGX vs RGAGX Comparison
Open Charts MBCGX vs RGAGX
MBCGX vs RGAGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MBCGX vs. RGAGX commentary
Aug 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MBCGX is a Buy and RGAGX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAGX has more cash in the bank: 357B vs. MBCGX (1.82B). RGAGX pays higher dividends than MBCGX: RGAGX (0.52) vs MBCGX (0.00). MBCGX was incepted earlier than RGAGX: MBCGX (25 years) vs RGAGX (17 years). MBCGX (1.16) is less costly to investors than RGAGX (0.29). RGAGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. MBCGX (14.00). RGAGX has a lower initial minimum investment than MBCGX: RGAGX (250) vs MBCGX (1000). RGAGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.40 vs. MBCGX (-34.39). RGAGX return over 5 years is better than : 16.29 vs. MBCGX (-57.45).
| MBCGX | RGAGX | MBCGX / RGAGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.16 | 0.29 | 400% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.16 | 0.29 | 400% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.996 | 7.559 | -40% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.82B | 357B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.52 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -34.39 | 5.40 | -637% |
| Returns for 3 years | -30.51 | 42.50 | -72% |
| Returns for 5 years | -57.45 | 16.29 | -353% |
| Returns for 10 years | -12.30 | 103.36 | -12% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers