Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MBCLX vs RGACX
MBCLX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts MBCLX vs RGACX
MBCLX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MBCLX vs. RGACX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MBCLX is a Hold and RGACX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 361B vs. MBCLX (1.91B). MBCLX (0.00) and RGACX (0.00) have matching dividends . MBCLX was incepted earlier than RGACX: MBCLX (25 years) vs RGACX (24 years). MBCLX (0.96) and RGACX (0.93) have similar cost to investors . RGACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. MBCLX (14.00). MBCLX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGACX: MBCLX (0) vs RGACX (250). RGACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.94 vs. MBCLX (-23.73). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 13.23 vs. MBCLX (-47.73).
| MBCLX | RGACX | MBCLX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 0.93 | 103% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 0.93 | 103% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.875 | 6.185 | -14% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.91B | 361B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -23.73 | 7.94 | -299% |
| Returns for 3 years | -18.39 | 43.05 | -43% |
| Returns for 5 years | -47.73 | 13.23 | -361% |
| Returns for 10 years | 16.56 | 107.97 | 15% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement