Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MBCLX vs RGAGX
MBCLX vs RGAGX Comparison
Open Charts MBCLX vs RGAGX
MBCLX vs RGAGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MBCLX vs. RGAGX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MBCLX is a Hold and RGAGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAGX has more cash in the bank: 361B vs. MBCLX (1.91B). RGAGX pays higher dividends than MBCLX: RGAGX (0.51) vs MBCLX (0.00). MBCLX was incepted earlier than RGAGX: MBCLX (25 years) vs RGAGX (17 years). MBCLX (0.96) is less costly to investors than RGAGX (0.29). RGAGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. MBCLX (14.00). MBCLX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGAGX: MBCLX (0) vs RGAGX (250). RGAGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.55 vs. MBCLX (-23.73). RGAGX return over 5 years is better than : 20.99 vs. MBCLX (-47.73).
| MBCLX | RGAGX | MBCLX / RGAGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 0.29 | 331% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 0.29 | 331% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.875 | 8.887 | -10% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.91B | 361B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.51 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -23.73 | 12.55 | -189% |
| Returns for 3 years | -18.39 | 50.34 | -37% |
| Returns for 5 years | -47.73 | 20.99 | -227% |
| Returns for 10 years | 16.56 | 122.10 | 14% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement