Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MBCLX vs RGAGX
MBCLX vs RGAGX Comparison
Open Charts MBCLX vs RGAGX
MBCLX vs RGAGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MBCLX vs. RGAGX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MBCLX is a Hold and RGAGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAGX has more cash in the bank: 338B vs. MBCLX (2.06B). RGAGX pays higher dividends than MBCLX: RGAGX (0.51) vs MBCLX (0.00). MBCLX was incepted earlier than RGAGX: MBCLX (25 years) vs RGAGX (17 years). MBCLX (0.96) is less costly to investors than RGAGX (0.29). RGAGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. MBCLX (14.00). MBCLX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGAGX: MBCLX (0) vs RGAGX (250). RGAGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.41 vs. MBCLX (-19.67). RGAGX return over 5 years is better than : 27.14 vs. MBCLX (-42.61).
| MBCLX | RGAGX | MBCLX / RGAGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 0.29 | 331% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 0.29 | 331% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.082 | 10.599 | 39% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.06B | 338B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.51 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -19.67 | 15.41 | -128% |
| Returns for 3 years | -12.33 | 55.31 | -22% |
| Returns for 5 years | -42.61 | 27.14 | -157% |
| Returns for 10 years | 16.76 | 117.06 | 14% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers