Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MBCNX vs RGACX
MBCNX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts MBCNX vs RGACX
MBCNX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MBCNX vs. RGACX commentary
Aug 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MBCNX is a Buy and RGACX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 357B vs. MBCNX (1.82B). MBCNX (0.00) and RGACX (0.00) have matching dividends . MBCNX was incepted earlier than RGACX: MBCNX (24 years) vs RGACX (24 years). MBCNX (1.36) is less costly to investors than RGACX (0.93). RGACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. MBCNX (14.00). MBCNX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGACX: MBCNX (0) vs RGACX (250). RGACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.93 vs. MBCNX (-44.85). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 10.91 vs. MBCNX (-67.59).
| MBCNX | RGACX | MBCNX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 0.93 | 146% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 0.93 | 146% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -3.167 | 5.397 | -59% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.82B | 357B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -44.85 | 0.93 | -4,837% |
| Returns for 3 years | -46.17 | 33.65 | -137% |
| Returns for 5 years | -67.59 | 10.91 | -620% |
| Returns for 10 years | -34.46 | 94.42 | -37% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement