Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MBCSX vs RGACX
MBCSX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts MBCSX vs RGACX
MBCSX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MBCSX vs. RGACX commentary
Jul 06, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MBCSX is a Buy and RGACX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 361B vs. MBCSX (1.87B). MBCSX (0.00) and RGACX (0.00) have matching dividends . MBCSX was incepted earlier than RGACX: MBCSX (25 years) vs RGACX (24 years). RGACX (0.93) is less costly to investors than MBCSX (0.76). RGACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. MBCSX (14.00). MBCSX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGACX: MBCSX (0) vs RGACX (250). RGACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.42 vs. MBCSX (-25.80). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 13.37 vs. MBCSX (-45.61).
| MBCSX | RGACX | MBCSX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.76 | 0.93 | 82% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.76 | 0.93 | 82% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.794 | 7.695 | -23% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.87B | 361B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -25.80 | 5.42 | -476% |
| Returns for 3 years | -15.75 | 41.34 | -38% |
| Returns for 5 years | -45.61 | 13.37 | -341% |
| Returns for 10 years | 22.27 | 104.88 | 21% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement