Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MBCSX vs RGAFX
MBCSX vs RGAFX Comparison
Open Charts MBCSX vs RGAFX
MBCSX vs RGAFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MBCSX vs. RGAFX commentary
Jul 28, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MBCSX is a Buy and RGAFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAFX has more cash in the bank: 357B vs. MBCSX (1.77B). RGAFX pays higher dividends than MBCSX: RGAFX (0.46) vs MBCSX (0.00). MBCSX was incepted earlier than RGAFX: MBCSX (25 years) vs RGAFX (24 years). MBCSX (0.76) is less costly to investors than RGAFX (0.34). RGAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. MBCSX (14.00). MBCSX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGAFX: MBCSX (0) vs RGAFX (250). RGAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -0.18 vs. MBCSX (-30.26). RGAFX return over 5 years is better than : 12.16 vs. MBCSX (-49.09).
| MBCSX | RGAFX | MBCSX / RGAFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.76 | 0.34 | 224% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.76 | 0.34 | 224% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -5.488 | 3.942 | -139% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.77B | 357B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.46 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -30.26 | -0.18 | 16,551% |
| Returns for 3 years | -20.72 | 35.89 | -58% |
| Returns for 5 years | -49.09 | 12.16 | -404% |
| Returns for 10 years | 12.52 | 99.28 | 13% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers