Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MBCSX vs RGAGX
MBCSX vs RGAGX Comparison
Open Charts MBCSX vs RGAGX
MBCSX vs RGAGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MBCSX vs. RGAGX commentary
Jul 06, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MBCSX is a Buy and RGAGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAGX has more cash in the bank: 361B vs. MBCSX (1.87B). RGAGX pays higher dividends than MBCSX: RGAGX (0.51) vs MBCSX (0.00). MBCSX was incepted earlier than RGAGX: MBCSX (25 years) vs RGAGX (17 years). MBCSX (0.76) is less costly to investors than RGAGX (0.29). RGAGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. MBCSX (14.00). MBCSX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGAGX: MBCSX (0) vs RGAGX (250). RGAGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.50 vs. MBCSX (-25.80). RGAGX return over 5 years is better than : 17.64 vs. MBCSX (-45.61).
| MBCSX | RGAGX | MBCSX / RGAGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.76 | 0.29 | 262% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.76 | 0.29 | 262% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.794 | 8.055 | -22% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.87B | 361B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.51 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -25.80 | 6.50 | -397% |
| Returns for 3 years | -15.75 | 45.31 | -35% |
| Returns for 5 years | -45.61 | 17.64 | -259% |
| Returns for 10 years | 22.27 | 114.06 | 20% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers