Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MBCSX vs RGAGX
MBCSX vs RGAGX Comparison
Open Charts MBCSX vs RGAGX
MBCSX vs RGAGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MBCSX vs. RGAGX commentary
Jul 28, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MBCSX is a Buy and RGAGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAGX has more cash in the bank: 357B vs. MBCSX (1.77B). RGAGX pays higher dividends than MBCSX: RGAGX (0.51) vs MBCSX (0.00). MBCSX was incepted earlier than RGAGX: MBCSX (25 years) vs RGAGX (17 years). MBCSX (0.76) is less costly to investors than RGAGX (0.29). RGAGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. MBCSX (14.00). MBCSX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGAGX: MBCSX (0) vs RGAGX (250). RGAGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -0.10 vs. MBCSX (-30.26). RGAGX return over 5 years is better than : 12.42 vs. MBCSX (-49.09).
| MBCSX | RGAGX | MBCSX / RGAGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.76 | 0.29 | 262% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.76 | 0.29 | 262% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -5.488 | 3.984 | -138% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.77B | 357B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.51 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -30.26 | -0.10 | 30,829% |
| Returns for 3 years | -20.72 | 36.14 | -57% |
| Returns for 5 years | -49.09 | 12.42 | -395% |
| Returns for 10 years | 12.52 | 99.76 | 13% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement