Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MBCYX vs RGAFX
MBCYX vs RGAFX Comparison
Open Charts MBCYX vs RGAFX
MBCYX vs RGAFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MBCYX vs. RGAFX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MBCYX is a Hold and RGAFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAFX has more cash in the bank: 361B vs. MBCYX (1.91B). RGAFX pays higher dividends than MBCYX: RGAFX (0.46) vs MBCYX (0.00). MBCYX was incepted earlier than RGAFX: MBCYX (25 years) vs RGAFX (24 years). MBCYX (0.86) is less costly to investors than RGAFX (0.34). RGAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. MBCYX (14.00). MBCYX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGAFX: MBCYX (0) vs RGAFX (250). RGAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.96 vs. MBCYX (-24.36). RGAFX return over 5 years is better than : 17.20 vs. MBCYX (-46.49).
| MBCYX | RGAFX | MBCYX / RGAFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.86 | 0.34 | 253% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.86 | 0.34 | 253% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.414 | 6.478 | -37% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.91B | 361B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.46 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -24.36 | 8.96 | -272% |
| Returns for 3 years | -16.87 | 46.79 | -36% |
| Returns for 5 years | -46.49 | 17.20 | -270% |
| Returns for 10 years | 20.89 | 116.72 | 18% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement