Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MBCYX vs RGAFX
MBCYX vs RGAFX Comparison
Open Charts MBCYX vs RGAFX
MBCYX vs RGAFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MBCYX vs. RGAFX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MBCYX is a Hold and RGAFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAFX has more cash in the bank: 338B vs. MBCYX (2.06B). RGAFX pays higher dividends than MBCYX: RGAFX (0.46) vs MBCYX (0.00). MBCYX was incepted earlier than RGAFX: MBCYX (25 years) vs RGAFX (24 years). MBCYX (0.86) is less costly to investors than RGAFX (0.34). RGAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. MBCYX (14.00). MBCYX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGAFX: MBCYX (0) vs RGAFX (250). RGAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.34 vs. MBCYX (-18.01). RGAFX return over 5 years is better than : 26.83 vs. MBCYX (-39.99).
| MBCYX | RGAFX | MBCYX / RGAFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.86 | 0.34 | 253% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.86 | 0.34 | 253% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.114 | 10.570 | 39% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.06B | 338B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.46 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -18.01 | 15.34 | -117% |
| Returns for 3 years | -9.23 | 55.04 | -17% |
| Returns for 5 years | -39.99 | 26.83 | -149% |
| Returns for 10 years | 23.12 | 116.58 | 20% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers