Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MBCZX vs RGAHX
MBCZX vs RGAHX Comparison
Open Charts MBCZX vs RGAHX
MBCZX vs RGAHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MBCZX vs. RGAHX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MBCZX is a Hold and RGAHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAHX has more cash in the bank: 361B vs. MBCZX (1.91B). RGAHX pays higher dividends than MBCZX: RGAHX (0.39) vs MBCZX (0.00). MBCZX was incepted earlier than RGAHX: MBCZX (12 years) vs RGAHX (11 years). MBCZX (0.66) is less costly to investors than RGAHX (0.44). RGAHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. MBCZX (14.00). MBCZX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGAHX: MBCZX (0) vs RGAHX (250). RGAHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.70 vs. MBCZX (-20.73). RGAHX return over 5 years is better than : 16.22 vs. MBCZX (-42.97).
| MBCZX | RGAHX | MBCZX / RGAHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 0.44 | 150% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 0.44 | 150% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.677 | 6.424 | -11% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.91B | 361B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.39 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -20.73 | 8.70 | -238% |
| Returns for 3 years | -12.76 | 45.89 | -28% |
| Returns for 5 years | -42.97 | 16.22 | -265% |
| Returns for 10 years | 29.77 | 113.43 | 26% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement