Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MBCZX vs RGAHX
MBCZX vs RGAHX Comparison
Open Charts MBCZX vs RGAHX
MBCZX vs RGAHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MBCZX vs. RGAHX commentary
Jul 25, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MBCZX is a Hold and RGAHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAHX has more cash in the bank: 357B vs. MBCZX (1.83B). RGAHX pays higher dividends than MBCZX: RGAHX (0.40) vs MBCZX (0.00). MBCZX was incepted earlier than RGAHX: MBCZX (12 years) vs RGAHX (11 years). MBCZX (0.66) is less costly to investors than RGAHX (0.44). RGAHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. MBCZX (14.00). MBCZX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGAHX: MBCZX (0) vs RGAHX (250). RGAHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.41 vs. MBCZX (-27.80). RGAHX return over 5 years is better than : 12.16 vs. MBCZX (-46.93).
| MBCZX | RGAHX | MBCZX / RGAHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 0.44 | 150% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 0.44 | 150% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.655 | 4.758 | -56% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.83B | 357B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.40 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -27.80 | 0.41 | -6,779% |
| Returns for 3 years | -17.22 | 36.85 | -47% |
| Returns for 5 years | -46.93 | 12.16 | -386% |
| Returns for 10 years | 18.03 | 98.65 | 18% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement