Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MBCZX vs RGEBX
MBCZX vs RGEBX Comparison
Open Charts MBCZX vs RGEBX
MBCZX vs RGEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MBCZX vs. RGEBX commentary
Jul 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MBCZX is a Hold and RGEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGEBX has more cash in the bank: 357B vs. MBCZX (1.83B). MBCZX (0.00) and RGEBX (0.00) have matching dividends . MBCZX was incepted earlier than RGEBX: MBCZX (12 years) vs RGEBX (12 years). RGEBX (1.08) is less costly to investors than MBCZX (0.66). RGEBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. MBCZX (14.00). MBCZX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGEBX: MBCZX (0) vs RGEBX (250). RGEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -0.55 vs. MBCZX (-27.80). RGEBX return over 5 years is better than : 8.15 vs. MBCZX (-46.93).
| MBCZX | RGEBX | MBCZX / RGEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 1.08 | 61% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 1.08 | 61% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.655 | 4.396 | -60% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.83B | 357B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -27.80 | -0.55 | 5,084% |
| Returns for 3 years | -17.22 | 33.31 | -52% |
| Returns for 5 years | -46.93 | 8.15 | -576% |
| Returns for 10 years | 18.03 | 89.98 | 20% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement