Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MBCZX vs RGEBX
MBCZX vs RGEBX Comparison
Open Charts MBCZX vs RGEBX
MBCZX vs RGEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MBCZX vs. RGEBX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MBCZX is a Hold and RGEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGEBX has more cash in the bank: 361B vs. MBCZX (1.91B). MBCZX (0.00) and RGEBX (0.00) have matching dividends . MBCZX was incepted earlier than RGEBX: MBCZX (12 years) vs RGEBX (12 years). RGEBX (1.08) is less costly to investors than MBCZX (0.66). RGEBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. MBCZX (14.00). MBCZX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGEBX: MBCZX (0) vs RGEBX (250). RGEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.66 vs. MBCZX (-20.73). RGEBX return over 5 years is better than : 12.07 vs. MBCZX (-42.97).
| MBCZX | RGEBX | MBCZX / RGEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 1.08 | 61% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 1.08 | 61% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.677 | 6.118 | -11% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.91B | 361B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -20.73 | 7.66 | -271% |
| Returns for 3 years | -12.76 | 42.13 | -30% |
| Returns for 5 years | -42.97 | 12.07 | -356% |
| Returns for 10 years | 29.77 | 104.15 | 29% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement