MBFJF
Price
$15.53
Change
+$0.14 (+0.91%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
174.44B
NAUBF
Price
$28.00
Change
+$1.21 (+4.52%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
86.3B
Interact to see
Advertisement

MBFJF vs NAUBF

Header iconMBFJF vs NAUBF Comparison
Open Charts MBFJF vs NAUBFBanner chart's image
Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group
Price$15.53
Change+$0.14 (+0.91%)
Volume$535.96K
Capitalization174.44B
National Australia Bank Ltd. (Victoria, Australia)
Price$28.00
Change+$1.21 (+4.52%)
Volume$4.04K
Capitalization86.3B
MBFJF vs NAUBF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
MBFJF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NAUBF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MBFJF vs. NAUBF commentary
Sep 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MBFJF is a StrongBuy and NAUBF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 06, 2025
Stock price -- (MBFJF: $15.52 vs. NAUBF: $28.00)
Brand notoriety: MBFJF and NAUBF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Major Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MBFJF: 146% vs. NAUBF: 86%
Market capitalization -- MBFJF: $174.44B vs. NAUBF: $86.3B
MBFJF [@Major Banks] is valued at $174.44B. NAUBF’s [@Major Banks] market capitalization is $86.3B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Major Banks] industry ranges from $809.47B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Major Banks] industry is $131.72B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MBFJF’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileNAUBF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • MBFJF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • NAUBF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, both MBFJF and NAUBF are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MBFJF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NAUBF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MBFJF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • NAUBF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, NAUBF is a better buy in the short-term than MBFJF.

Price Growth

MBFJF (@Major Banks) experienced а -0.48% price change this week, while NAUBF (@Major Banks) price change was +4.91% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Major Banks industry was -0.01%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.41%, and the average quarterly price growth was +128.15%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Major Banks (-0.01% weekly)

Major banks are among the biggest companies in the world, often times with global reach and market capitalizations in the multi-billions. Large banks often have multiple arms spanning different disciplines, from deposits, to investment banking, to wealth management and insurance. The biggest banks often have key competitive advantages over smaller players in the industry in terms of brand recognition, cost of capital, and efficiency. Think J.P. Morgan, Bank of America, Wells Fargo, and Citigroup.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MBFJF($174B) has a higher market cap than NAUBF($86.3B). NAUBF has higher P/E ratio than MBFJF: NAUBF (19.12) vs MBFJF (14.40). MBFJF YTD gains are higher at: 45.775 vs. NAUBF (21.633). NAUBF has less debt than MBFJF: NAUBF (212B) vs MBFJF (46.25T). MBFJF has higher revenues than NAUBF: MBFJF (6.72T) vs NAUBF (20.7B).
MBFJFNAUBFMBFJF / NAUBF
Capitalization174B86.3B202%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD45.77521.633212%
P/E Ratio14.4019.1275%
Revenue6.72T20.7B32,449%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt46.25T212B21,815%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MBFJF vs NAUBF: Fundamental Ratings
MBFJF
NAUBF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8748
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
87
Overvalued
79
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1423
SMR RATING
1..100
14
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4643
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2938
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
6550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

NAUBF's Valuation (79) in the null industry is in the same range as MBFJF (87). This means that NAUBF’s stock grew similarly to MBFJF’s over the last 12 months.

MBFJF's Profit vs Risk Rating (14) in the null industry is in the same range as NAUBF (23). This means that MBFJF’s stock grew similarly to NAUBF’s over the last 12 months.

MBFJF's SMR Rating (1) in the null industry is in the same range as NAUBF (4). This means that MBFJF’s stock grew similarly to NAUBF’s over the last 12 months.

NAUBF's Price Growth Rating (43) in the null industry is in the same range as MBFJF (46). This means that NAUBF’s stock grew similarly to MBFJF’s over the last 12 months.

MBFJF's P/E Growth Rating (29) in the null industry is in the same range as NAUBF (38). This means that MBFJF’s stock grew similarly to NAUBF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MBFJFNAUBF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
48%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
35%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
57%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
57%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 17 days ago
47%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
40%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
46%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MBFJF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NAUBF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
VSA2.120.02
+0.95%
TCTM Kids IT Education Inc
SPNS42.93N/A
N/A
Sapiens International Corp
KRT25.49-0.18
-0.70%
Karat Packaging
ONON45.52-0.53
-1.15%
On Holding AG
OBLG2.61-0.06
-2.25%
Oblong Inc

MBFJF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MBFJF and MUFG have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MBFJF and MUFG's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MBFJF
1D Price
Change %
MBFJF100%
+0.98%
MUFG - MBFJF
28%
Poorly correlated
-0.72%
SMFG - MBFJF
26%
Poorly correlated
-1.08%
BBVXF - MBFJF
23%
Poorly correlated
+1.45%
BACHY - MBFJF
23%
Poorly correlated
+0.36%
CMWAY - MBFJF
21%
Poorly correlated
-0.22%
More

NAUBF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that NAUBF and FANDF have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NAUBF and FANDF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NAUBF
1D Price
Change %
NAUBF100%
+4.52%
FANDF - NAUBF
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MBFJF - NAUBF
11%
Poorly correlated
+0.98%
SCBFF - NAUBF
8%
Poorly correlated
+2.84%
IDCBY - NAUBF
6%
Poorly correlated
+0.80%
INGVF - NAUBF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More