Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MBGAX vs MSNCX
MBGAX vs MSNCX Comparison
Open Charts MBGAX vs MSNCX
MBGAX vs MSNCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MBGAX vs. MSNCX commentary
Jul 01, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MBGAX is a Hold and MSNCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MSNCX has more cash in the bank: 578M vs. MBGAX (137M). MSNCX pays higher dividends than MBGAX: MSNCX (3.29) vs MBGAX (2.45). MBGAX was incepted earlier than MSNCX: MBGAX (33 years) vs MSNCX (42 years). MBGAX (1.74) is less costly to investors than MSNCX (0.86). MBGAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 13.00 vs. MSNCX (6.00). MBGAX (1000) and MSNCX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. MSNCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.54 vs. MBGAX (6.92). MSNCX return over 5 years is better than : 3.55 vs. MBGAX (-0.50).
| MBGAX | MSNCX | MBGAX / MSNCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.65 | 0.84 | 196% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.74 | 0.86 | 202% |
| Fund Existence | 33 years | 42 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.135 | 2.595 | 82% |
| Front Load | N/A | 4% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 137M | 578M | 24% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.45 | 3.29 | 74% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.92 | 7.54 | 92% |
| Returns for 3 years | 9.28 | 12.01 | 77% |
| Returns for 5 years | -0.50 | 3.55 | -14% |
| Returns for 10 years | 6.85 | 14.93 | 46% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers