Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MBGAX vs MSNCX
MBGAX vs MSNCX Comparison
Open Charts MBGAX vs MSNCX
MBGAX vs MSNCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MBGAX vs. MSNCX commentary
Jun 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MBGAX is a Hold and MSNCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MSNCX has more cash in the bank: 570M vs. MBGAX (133M). MSNCX pays higher dividends than MBGAX: MSNCX (3.29) vs MBGAX (2.45). MBGAX was incepted earlier than MSNCX: MBGAX (33 years) vs MSNCX (42 years). MBGAX (1.74) is less costly to investors than MSNCX (0.86). MBGAX (20.00) and MSNCX (20.00) have comparable annual turnover. MBGAX (1000) and MSNCX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. MSNCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.08 vs. MBGAX (7.39). MSNCX return over 5 years is better than : 3.22 vs. MBGAX (-0.91).
| MBGAX | MSNCX | MBGAX / MSNCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.65 | 0.84 | 196% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.74 | 0.86 | 202% |
| Fund Existence | 33 years | 42 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.635 | 2.032 | 80% |
| Front Load | N/A | 4% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 133M | 570M | 23% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.45 | 3.29 | 74% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.39 | 8.08 | 91% |
| Returns for 3 years | 8.82 | 11.55 | 76% |
| Returns for 5 years | -0.91 | 3.22 | -28% |
| Returns for 10 years | 7.67 | 15.65 | 49% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement