Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MBGFX vs RGAHX
MBGFX vs RGAHX Comparison
Open Charts MBGFX vs RGAHX
MBGFX vs RGAHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MBGFX vs. RGAHX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MBGFX is a Buy and RGAHX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAHX has more cash in the bank: 353B vs. MBGFX (1.81B). RGAHX pays higher dividends than MBGFX: RGAHX (0.40) vs MBGFX (0.00). MBGFX was incepted earlier than RGAHX: MBGFX (12 years) vs RGAHX (11 years). MBGFX (1.11) is less costly to investors than RGAHX (0.44). RGAHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. MBGFX (14.00). MBGFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGAHX: MBGFX (0) vs RGAHX (250). RGAHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.18 vs. MBGFX (-36.04). RGAHX return over 5 years is better than : 13.78 vs. MBGFX (-56.82).
| MBGFX | RGAHX | MBGFX / RGAHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.11 | 0.44 | 252% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.11 | 0.44 | 252% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.850 | 9.200 | -9% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.81B | 353B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.40 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -36.04 | 0.18 | -20,072% |
| Returns for 3 years | -29.01 | 43.47 | -67% |
| Returns for 5 years | -56.82 | 13.78 | -412% |
| Returns for 10 years | -7.63 | 106.68 | -7% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement