Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MBINX vs RLBAX
MBINX vs RLBAX Comparison
Open Charts MBINX vs RLBAX
MBINX vs RLBAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MBINX vs. RLBAX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MBINX is a Hold and RLBAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBAX has more cash in the bank: 279B vs. MBINX (445M). MBINX pays higher dividends than RLBAX: MBINX (1.63) vs RLBAX (1.14). MBINX was incepted earlier than RLBAX: MBINX (18 years) vs RLBAX (24 years). MBINX (1.43) is less costly to investors than RLBAX (1.32). MBINX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 201.00 vs. RLBAX (50.00). RLBAX has a lower initial minimum investment than MBINX: RLBAX (250) vs MBINX (1000). RLBAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.80 vs. MBINX (8.59). RLBAX return over 5 years is better than : 31.17 vs. MBINX (-2.97).
| MBINX | RLBAX | MBINX / RLBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.33 | 1.32 | 101% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.43 | 1.32 | 108% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.720 | 9.354 | 50% |
| Front Load | 3% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 445M | 279B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.63 | 1.14 | 143% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.59 | 16.80 | 51% |
| Returns for 3 years | 22.58 | 42.23 | 53% |
| Returns for 5 years | -2.97 | 31.17 | -10% |
| Returns for 10 years | 17.49 | 77.06 | 23% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement