Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MBINX vs RLBAX
MBINX vs RLBAX Comparison
Open Charts MBINX vs RLBAX
MBINX vs RLBAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MBINX vs. RLBAX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MBINX is a StrongBuy and RLBAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBAX has more cash in the bank: 288B vs. MBINX (447M). MBINX pays higher dividends than RLBAX: MBINX (1.66) vs RLBAX (1.11). MBINX was incepted earlier than RLBAX: MBINX (18 years) vs RLBAX (24 years). MBINX (1.43) is less costly to investors than RLBAX (1.32). MBINX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 201.00 vs. RLBAX (50.00). RLBAX has a lower initial minimum investment than MBINX: RLBAX (250) vs MBINX (1000). RLBAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.17 vs. MBINX (8.02). RLBAX return over 5 years is better than : 28.90 vs. MBINX (-0.83).
| MBINX | RLBAX | MBINX / RLBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.33 | 1.32 | 101% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.43 | 1.32 | 108% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.505 | 8.124 | 80% |
| Front Load | 3% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 447M | 288B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.66 | 1.11 | 150% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.02 | 11.17 | 72% |
| Returns for 3 years | 21.64 | 36.52 | 59% |
| Returns for 5 years | -0.83 | 28.90 | -3% |
| Returns for 10 years | 17.40 | 72.56 | 24% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement