MBWM
Price
$49.09
Change
-$0.16 (-0.32%)
Updated
Sep 2, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
800.24M
49 days until earnings call
NIC
Price
$136.42
Change
-$1.87 (-1.35%)
Updated
Sep 2, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
2.05B
56 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

MBWM vs NIC

Header iconMBWM vs NIC Comparison
Open Charts MBWM vs NICBanner chart's image
Mercantile Bank
Price$49.09
Change-$0.16 (-0.32%)
Volume$2.73K
Capitalization800.24M
Nicolet Bankshares
Price$136.42
Change-$1.87 (-1.35%)
Volume$285
Capitalization2.05B
MBWM vs NIC Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
MBWM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NIC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MBWM vs. NIC commentary
Sep 03, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MBWM is a Buy and NIC is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 03, 2025
Stock price -- (MBWM: $49.25 vs. NIC: $138.29)
Brand notoriety: MBWM and NIC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MBWM: 60% vs. NIC: 50%
Market capitalization -- MBWM: $800.24M vs. NIC: $2.05B
MBWM [@Regional Banks] is valued at $800.24M. NIC’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $2.05B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $166.59B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $7.82B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MBWM’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileNIC’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • MBWM’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • NIC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, MBWM is a better buy in the long-term than NIC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MBWM’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NIC’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MBWM’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • NIC’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MBWM is a better buy in the short-term than NIC.

Price Growth

MBWM (@Regional Banks) experienced а -0.51% price change this week, while NIC (@Regional Banks) price change was +1.54% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.09%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.70%, and the average quarterly price growth was +12.92%.

Reported Earning Dates

MBWM is expected to report earnings on Oct 21, 2025.

NIC is expected to report earnings on Oct 28, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.09% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NIC($2.06B) has a higher market cap than MBWM($800M). NIC has higher P/E ratio than MBWM: NIC (15.84) vs MBWM (9.79). NIC YTD gains are higher at: 32.482 vs. MBWM (12.561). NIC has more cash in the bank: 105M vs. MBWM (70.3M). NIC has less debt than MBWM: NIC (134M) vs MBWM (496M). NIC has higher revenues than MBWM: NIC (367M) vs MBWM (235M).
MBWMNICMBWM / NIC
Capitalization800M2.06B39%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD12.56132.48239%
P/E Ratio9.7915.8462%
Revenue235M367M64%
Total Cash70.3M105M67%
Total Debt496M134M370%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MBWM vs NIC: Fundamental Ratings
MBWM
NIC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
38
Fair valued
73
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1522
SMR RATING
1..100
2621
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4945
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3735
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MBWM's Valuation (38) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NIC (73). This means that MBWM’s stock grew somewhat faster than NIC’s over the last 12 months.

MBWM's Profit vs Risk Rating (15) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as NIC (22). This means that MBWM’s stock grew similarly to NIC’s over the last 12 months.

NIC's SMR Rating (21) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as MBWM (26). This means that NIC’s stock grew similarly to MBWM’s over the last 12 months.

NIC's Price Growth Rating (45) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as MBWM (49). This means that NIC’s stock grew similarly to MBWM’s over the last 12 months.

NIC's P/E Growth Rating (35) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as MBWM (37). This means that NIC’s stock grew similarly to MBWM’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MBWMNIC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
53%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
60%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
68%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
60%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
56%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
59%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
60%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
58%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
53%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
41%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
54%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MBWM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NIC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AMLPX9.500.03
+0.32%
MainGate MLP A
FQUAX21.16-0.01
-0.05%
AMG River Road Large Cap Value Select N
PSLCX11.13-0.02
-0.18%
Putnam Small Cap Value C
DREVX20.23-0.18
-0.88%
BNY Mellon Large Cap Securities Inc
PGODX82.66-1.01
-1.21%
Putnam Large Cap Growth R5

MBWM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MBWM has been closely correlated with PEBO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 91% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MBWM jumps, then PEBO could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MBWM
1D Price
Change %
MBWM100%
-0.93%
PEBO - MBWM
91%
Closely correlated
-0.48%
TCBK - MBWM
89%
Closely correlated
-0.55%
STBA - MBWM
89%
Closely correlated
-0.48%
BY - MBWM
89%
Closely correlated
-0.48%
HOPE - MBWM
88%
Closely correlated
-0.54%
More