MBWM
Price
$59.61
Change
-$0.19 (-0.32%)
Updated
Aug 21 closing price
Capitalization
1.03B
58 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
NIC
Price
$173.23
Change
+$1.54 (+0.90%)
Updated
Aug 21 closing price
Capitalization
3.63B
58 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

MBWM vs NIC

MBWM vs NIC Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MBWM vs. NIC commentary
Aug 23, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MBWM is a Hold and NIC is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 23, 2026
Stock price -- (MBWM: $59.61 vs. NIC: $173.23)
Brand notoriety: MBWM and NIC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MBWM: 50% vs. NIC: 36%
Market capitalization -- MBWM: $1.03B vs. NIC: $3.63B
MBWM [@Regional Banks] is valued at $1.03B. NIC’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $3.63B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $142.82B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.34B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MBWM’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileNIC’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • MBWM’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • NIC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, MBWM is a better buy in the long-term than NIC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MBWM’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NIC’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MBWM’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • NIC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both MBWM and NIC are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

MBWM (@Regional Banks) experienced а -3.17% price change this week, while NIC (@Regional Banks) price change was -3.23% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -2.32%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.91%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.01%.

Reported Earning Dates

MBWM is expected to report earnings on Oct 20, 2026.

NIC is expected to report earnings on Oct 20, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-2.32% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NIC($3.63B) has a higher market cap than MBWM($1.03B). NIC has higher P/E ratio than MBWM: NIC (19.42) vs MBWM (10.48). NIC YTD gains are higher at: 43.479 vs. MBWM (25.799). NIC has more cash in the bank: 123M vs. MBWM (48.4M). NIC has less debt than MBWM: NIC (92.8M) vs MBWM (472M). NIC has higher revenues than MBWM: NIC (519M) vs MBWM (261M).
MBWMNICMBWM / NIC
Capitalization1.03B3.63B28%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD25.79943.47959%
P/E Ratio10.4819.4254%
Revenue261M519M50%
Total Cash48.4M123M39%
Total Debt472M92.8M509%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MBWM vs NIC: Fundamental Ratings
MBWM
NIC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5085
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
43
Fair valued
89
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1214
SMR RATING
1..100
4645
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4544
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3423
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5085

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MBWM's Valuation (43) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NIC (89). This means that MBWM’s stock grew somewhat faster than NIC’s over the last 12 months.

MBWM's Profit vs Risk Rating (12) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as NIC (14). This means that MBWM’s stock grew similarly to NIC’s over the last 12 months.

NIC's SMR Rating (45) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as MBWM (46). This means that NIC’s stock grew similarly to MBWM’s over the last 12 months.

NIC's Price Growth Rating (44) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as MBWM (45). This means that NIC’s stock grew similarly to MBWM’s over the last 12 months.

NIC's P/E Growth Rating (23) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as MBWM (34). This means that NIC’s stock grew similarly to MBWM’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MBWMNIC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
46%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
59%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
52%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
61%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
64%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
58%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
61%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
61%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
56%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
44%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MBWM
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
NIC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
NTSD48.020.47
+0.99%
WisdomTree Efficient U.S. Pls Intl Eq Fd
IND23.000.11
+0.48%
Xtrackers Nifty 500 India ETF
SRLN40.620.07
+0.17%
State Street® Blackstone Senior Loan ETF
BKUI49.68-0.02
-0.04%
BNY Mellon Ultra Short Income ETF
SDOW22.97-0.67
-2.83%
ProShares UltraPro Short Dow30

MBWM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MBWM has been closely correlated with THFF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 86% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MBWM jumps, then THFF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MBWM
1D Price
Change %
MBWM100%
-0.32%
THFF - MBWM
86%
Closely correlated
-0.03%
SRCE - MBWM
86%
Closely correlated
-0.37%
PRK - MBWM
85%
Closely correlated
+0.54%
IBCP - MBWM
85%
Closely correlated
-0.35%
PEBO - MBWM
84%
Closely correlated
+0.23%
More

NIC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NIC has been closely correlated with WSBC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 80% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if NIC jumps, then WSBC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NIC
1D Price
Change %
NIC100%
+0.90%
WSBC - NIC
80%
Closely correlated
-0.05%
BUSE - NIC
75%
Closely correlated
+0.30%
EFSC - NIC
75%
Closely correlated
-0.53%
MBWM - NIC
75%
Closely correlated
-0.32%
CTBI - NIC
74%
Closely correlated
+0.39%
More