MBWM
Price
$57.42
Change
+$0.40 (+0.70%)
Updated
Jul 13 closing price
Capitalization
992.93M
7 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
PGC
Price
$46.31
Change
+$0.09 (+0.19%)
Updated
Jul 13 closing price
Capitalization
820.18M
13 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

MBWM vs PGC

MBWM vs PGC Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MBWM vs. PGC commentary
Jul 14, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MBWM is a Hold and PGC is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 14, 2026
Stock price -- (MBWM: $57.42 vs. PGC: $46.31)
Brand notoriety: MBWM and PGC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MBWM: 31% vs. PGC: 90%
Market capitalization -- MBWM: $992.93M vs. PGC: $820.18M
MBWM [@Regional Banks] is valued at $992.93M. PGC’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $820.18M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $142.82B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.48B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MBWM’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whilePGC’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • MBWM’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • PGC’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, MBWM is a better buy in the long-term than PGC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MBWM’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PGC’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MBWM’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • PGC’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both MBWM and PGC are a bad buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

MBWM (@Regional Banks) experienced а -0.88% price change this week, while PGC (@Regional Banks) price change was -3.20% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -0.58%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.41%, and the average quarterly price growth was +15.22%.

Reported Earning Dates

MBWM is expected to report earnings on Jul 21, 2026.

PGC is expected to report earnings on Jul 27, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-0.58% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MBWM($993M) has a higher market cap than PGC($820M). PGC has higher P/E ratio than MBWM: PGC (18.74) vs MBWM (10.30). PGC YTD gains are higher at: 66.719 vs. MBWM (21.178). MBWM has more cash in the bank: 48.4M vs. PGC (8.71M). PGC has less debt than MBWM: PGC (106M) vs MBWM (484M). PGC has higher revenues than MBWM: PGC (294M) vs MBWM (253M).
MBWMPGCMBWM / PGC
Capitalization993M820M121%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD21.17866.71932%
P/E Ratio10.3018.7455%
Revenue253M294M86%
Total Cash48.4M8.71M556%
Total Debt484M106M457%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MBWM vs PGC: Fundamental Ratings
MBWM
PGC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
4283
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
35
Fair valued
76
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1658
SMR RATING
1..100
4664
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4640
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5138
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MBWM's Valuation (35) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PGC (76). This means that MBWM’s stock grew somewhat faster than PGC’s over the last 12 months.

MBWM's Profit vs Risk Rating (16) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PGC (58). This means that MBWM’s stock grew somewhat faster than PGC’s over the last 12 months.

MBWM's SMR Rating (46) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as PGC (64). This means that MBWM’s stock grew similarly to PGC’s over the last 12 months.

PGC's Price Growth Rating (40) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as MBWM (46). This means that PGC’s stock grew similarly to MBWM’s over the last 12 months.

PGC's P/E Growth Rating (38) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as MBWM (51). This means that PGC’s stock grew similarly to MBWM’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MBWMPGC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
80%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
67%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
58%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
70%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
62%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
67%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
62%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
60%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
64%
Bullish Trend 18 days ago
66%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
66%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
60%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
53%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MBWM
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
PGC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
IHOSX25.14N/A
N/A
Hartford International Opportunities R4
TEPSX48.10N/A
N/A
ProFunds Technology UltraSector Svc
EAGCX15.91N/A
N/A
Eaton Vance Atlanta Capital Focused Gr C
JACFX20.68N/A
N/A
JHancock Mid Cap Growth NAV
RNWCX102.77-2.48
-2.36%
American Funds New World R-3

PGC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PGC has been closely correlated with PEBO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 82% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PGC jumps, then PEBO could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PGC
1D Price
Change %
PGC100%
+0.19%
PEBO - PGC
82%
Closely correlated
+0.31%
DCOM - PGC
79%
Closely correlated
+0.38%
HOPE - PGC
78%
Closely correlated
N/A
BUSE - PGC
78%
Closely correlated
+0.24%
MBWM - PGC
77%
Closely correlated
+0.70%
More