MBXIX has more cash in the bank: 11.1B vs. QLFRX (29.6M). QLFRX pays higher dividends than MBXIX: QLFRX (0.22) vs MBXIX (0.00). MBXIX was incepted earlier than QLFRX: MBXIX (11 years) vs QLFRX (1 year). QLFRX (9.24) is less costly to investors than MBXIX (2.00). QLFRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 373.00 vs. MBXIX (19.00). MBXIX has a lower initial minimum investment than QLFRX: MBXIX (2500) vs QLFRX (50000000). MBXIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 19.19 vs. QLFRX (14.43).

	MBXIX	QLFRX	MBXIX / QLFRX
Total Expense Ratio	2.00	6.94	29%
Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio	2.00	9.24	22%
Fund Existence	11 years	1 year	-
Gain YTD	17.304	3.824	453%
Front Load	N/A	N/A	-
Min. Initial Investment	2500	50000000	0%
Min. Initial Investment IRA	N/A	N/A	-
Net Assets	11.1B	29.6M	37,500%
Annual Yield % from dividends	0.00	0.22	-
Returns for 1 year	19.19	14.43	133%
Returns for 3 years	31.85	N/A	-
Returns for 5 years	44.55	N/A	-
Returns for 10 years	106.32	N/A	-

View a ticker or compare two or three

Ask AI

Compare

Interact to see
Advertisement

Interesting Tickers

MFs / NAME	Price $	Chg $	Chg %
		1 Day
CTSIX	57.69	0.70	+1.23%
Calamos Timpani Small Cap Growth I
WEBCX	9.93	N/A	N/A
TETON Westwood Balanced A
BIALX	28.59	N/A	N/A
Brown Advisory Global Leaders Investor
SREZX	14.67	N/A	N/A
PGIM Select Real Estate Z
TRZZX	63.91	N/A	N/A
T. Rowe Price Small-Cap Stock Z