MBXIX has more cash in the bank: 10.6B vs. QLFRX (20.8M). QLFRX pays higher dividends than MBXIX: QLFRX (0.23) vs MBXIX (0.00). MBXIX was incepted earlier than QLFRX: MBXIX (11 years) vs QLFRX (1 year). QLFRX (9.24) is less costly to investors than MBXIX (2.00). QLFRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 373.00 vs. MBXIX (19.00). MBXIX has a lower initial minimum investment than QLFRX: MBXIX (2500) vs QLFRX (50000000). QLFRX (17.88) and MBXIX (17.29) have marching annual gain over last year.

	MBXIX	QLFRX	MBXIX / QLFRX
Total Expense Ratio	2.00	6.94	29%
Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio	2.00	9.24	22%
Fund Existence	11 years	1 year	-
Gain YTD	13.700	-0.083	-16,483%
Front Load	N/A	N/A	-
Min. Initial Investment	2500	50000000	0%
Min. Initial Investment IRA	N/A	N/A	-
Net Assets	10.6B	20.8M	50,962%
Annual Yield % from dividends	0.00	0.23	-
Returns for 1 year	17.29	17.88	97%
Returns for 3 years	30.74	N/A	-
Returns for 5 years	36.94	N/A	-
Returns for 10 years	91.09	N/A	-

View a ticker or compare two or three

Ask AI

Compare

Interact to see
Advertisement

Interesting Tickers

MFs / NAME	Price $	Chg $	Chg %
		1 Day
USLCX	30.26	N/A	N/A
JHancock U.S. Global Leaders Growth C
CGOAX	37.35	N/A	N/A
Columbia Small Cap Growth A
MUOCX	34.11	N/A	N/A
Morgan Stanley Instl US Core C
RSMRX	16.91	N/A	N/A
RBC SMID Cap Growth R6
TRZAX	58.48	N/A	N/A
T. Rowe Price Value Z