Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MBXIX vs RHSIX
MBXIX vs RHSIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MBXIX vs. RHSIX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MBXIX is a Hold and RHSIX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MBXIX has more cash in the bank: 8.19B vs. RHSIX (9.53M). RHSIX pays higher dividends than MBXIX: RHSIX (6.66) vs MBXIX (1.80). MBXIX was incepted earlier than RHSIX: MBXIX (10 years) vs RHSIX (9 years). RHSIX (2.94) is less costly to investors than MBXIX (2.03). RHSIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 28.00 vs. MBXIX (19.00). RHSIX has a lower initial minimum investment than MBXIX: RHSIX (1000) vs MBXIX (2500). RHSIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.46 vs. MBXIX (0.37). MBXIX return over 5 years is better than : 45.69 vs. RHSIX (26.90).
| MBXIX | RHSIX | MBXIX / RHSIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.03 | 1.91 | 106% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.03 | 2.94 | 69% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.417 | 2.896 | 49% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000 | 250% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 8.19B | 9.53M | 85,887% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.80 | 6.66 | 27% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.37 | 0.46 | 81% |
| Returns for 3 years | 11.52 | 34.08 | 34% |
| Returns for 5 years | 45.69 | 26.90 | 170% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement