MC
Price
$56.75
Change
-$3.43 (-5.70%)
Updated
May 21, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
3.79B
63 days until earnings call
PWP
Price
$17.63
Change
-$0.97 (-5.22%)
Updated
May 21, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
727.72M
71 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

MC vs PWP

Header iconMC vs PWP Comparison
Open Charts MC vs PWPBanner chart's image
Moelis & Company
Price$56.75
Change-$3.43 (-5.70%)
Volume$12.04K
Capitalization3.79B
Perella Weinberg Partners
Price$17.63
Change-$0.97 (-5.22%)
Volume$21.67K
Capitalization727.72M
MC vs PWP Comparison Chart
Loading...
MC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PWP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MC vs. PWP commentary
May 22, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MC is a Buy and PWP is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
May 22, 2025
Stock price -- (MC: $56.77 vs. PWP: $17.65)
Brand notoriety: MC and PWP are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Banks/Brokers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MC: 81% vs. PWP: 82%
Market capitalization -- MC: $3.79B vs. PWP: $727.72M
MC [@Investment Banks/Brokers] is valued at $3.79B. PWP’s [@Investment Banks/Brokers] market capitalization is $727.72M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry ranges from $928.5B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry is $12.04B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MC’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whilePWP’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • MC’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • PWP’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, MC is a better buy in the long-term than PWP.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MC’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PWP’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MC’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • PWP’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both MC and PWP are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

MC (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а -6.61% price change this week, while PWP (@Investment Banks/Brokers) price change was -8.31% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was +0.79%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +23.16%, and the average quarterly price growth was +97.02%.

Reported Earning Dates

MC is expected to report earnings on Jul 23, 2025.

PWP is expected to report earnings on Jul 31, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Banks/Brokers (+0.79% weekly)

These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MC($3.79B) has a higher market cap than PWP($728M). MC YTD gains are higher at: -21.566 vs. PWP (-25.478). MC has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -32.04M vs. PWP (-97.87M). PWP has more cash in the bank: 338M vs. MC (186M). PWP has less debt than MC: PWP (176M) vs MC (216M). MC has higher revenues than PWP: MC (855M) vs PWP (649M).
MCPWPMC / PWP
Capitalization3.79B728M520%
EBITDA-32.04M-97.87M33%
Gain YTD-21.566-25.47885%
P/E Ratio82.58N/A-
Revenue855M649M132%
Total Cash186M338M55%
Total Debt216M176M123%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MC: Fundamental Ratings
MC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
19
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
21
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
33
SMR RATING
1..100
24
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
53
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
6

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MCPWP
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
72%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
74%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PWP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FIVQX12.40N/A
N/A
Fidelity Advisor International Value I
SDVSX15.81N/A
N/A
Sit Dividend Growth S
MDOBX10.48N/A
N/A
Morgan Stanley Developing Opportunity C
BAICX10.20-0.08
-0.78%
BlackRock Multi-Asset Income Investor A
CAHEX17.33-0.15
-0.86%
Calamos Hedged Equity A

MC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MC has been closely correlated with EVR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 89% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MC jumps, then EVR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MC
1D Price
Change %
MC100%
-5.67%
EVR - MC
89%
Closely correlated
-5.26%
PIPR - MC
88%
Closely correlated
-3.96%
LAZ - MC
85%
Closely correlated
-4.84%
GS - MC
82%
Closely correlated
-2.15%
JEF - MC
82%
Closely correlated
-4.66%
More

PWP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PWP has been closely correlated with EVR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 82% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PWP jumps, then EVR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PWP
1D Price
Change %
PWP100%
-5.11%
EVR - PWP
82%
Closely correlated
-5.26%
MC - PWP
82%
Closely correlated
-5.67%
SF - PWP
77%
Closely correlated
-2.80%
JEF - PWP
76%
Closely correlated
-4.66%
HLI - PWP
76%
Closely correlated
-2.58%
More