MC
Price
$67.08
Change
-$1.27 (-1.86%)
Updated
Jul 31 closing price
Capitalization
4.97B
93 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
PWP
Price
$17.65
Change
+$2.74 (+18.38%)
Updated
Jul 31 closing price
Capitalization
1.29B
95 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

MC vs PWP

MC vs PWP Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MC vs. PWP commentary
Aug 03, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MC is a Hold and PWP is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 03, 2026
Stock price -- (MC: $67.08 vs. PWP: $17.65)
Brand notoriety: MC and PWP are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Banks/Brokers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MC: 281% vs. PWP: 177%
Market capitalization -- MC: $4.97B vs. PWP: $1.29B
MC [@Investment Banks/Brokers] is valued at $4.97B. PWP’s [@Investment Banks/Brokers] market capitalization is $1.29B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry ranges from $928.5B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry is $13.17B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MC’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whilePWP’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • MC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • PWP’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, MC is a better buy in the long-term than PWP.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MC’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PWP’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MC’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • PWP’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, PWP is a better buy in the short-term than MC.

Price Growth

MC (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а +0.12% price change this week, while PWP (@Investment Banks/Brokers) price change was +12.64% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was +0.01%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -6.73%, and the average quarterly price growth was -16.94%.

Reported Earning Dates

MC is expected to report earnings on Nov 04, 2026.

PWP is expected to report earnings on Nov 06, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Banks/Brokers (+0.01% weekly)

These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MC($4.97B) has a higher market cap than PWP($1.29B). PWP has higher P/E ratio than MC: PWP (67.88) vs MC (23.37). PWP YTD gains are higher at: 2.776 vs. MC (-0.449). MC has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 304M vs. PWP (42M). MC has more cash in the bank: 208M vs. PWP (116M). PWP has less debt than MC: PWP (179M) vs MC (263M). MC has higher revenues than PWP: MC (1.57B) vs PWP (689M).
MCPWPMC / PWP
Capitalization4.97B1.29B386%
EBITDA304M42M724%
Gain YTD-0.4492.776-16%
P/E Ratio23.3767.8834%
Revenue1.57B689M228%
Total Cash208M116M179%
Total Debt263M179M147%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MC: Fundamental Ratings
MC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
71
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
10
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
59
SMR RATING
1..100
23
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
53
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
67
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MCPWP
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
64%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
74%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
74%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
74%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
PWP
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ABCEX11.820.16
+1.37%
AB Emerging Markets Multi-Asset C
CGFCX70.830.82
+1.17%
American Funds Growth Fd of Amer 529-C
TGDVX16.820.12
+0.72%
TCW Relative Value Large Cap N
CTHRX135.840.65
+0.48%
Columbia Global Technology Growth Inst2
FEDDX22.59-0.10
-0.44%
Fidelity Emerging Markets Discovery

PWP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PWP has been closely correlated with RJF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PWP jumps, then RJF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PWP
1D Price
Change %
PWP100%
+18.38%
RJF - PWP
72%
Closely correlated
+0.58%
PIPR - PWP
72%
Closely correlated
-0.50%
MC - PWP
67%
Closely correlated
-1.86%
EVR - PWP
65%
Loosely correlated
+2.46%
PJT - PWP
65%
Loosely correlated
+0.45%
More