MC
Price
$67.36
Change
+$0.42 (+0.63%)
Updated
Jun 23, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
4.98B
36 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
PWP
Price
$16.08
Change
+$0.07 (+0.44%)
Updated
Jun 23, 04:15 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
1.17B
37 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

MC vs PWP

MC vs PWP Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MC vs. PWP commentary
Jun 23, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MC is a Hold and PWP is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 23, 2026
Stock price -- (MC: $66.94 vs. PWP: $16.02)
Brand notoriety: MC and PWP are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Banks/Brokers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MC: 84% vs. PWP: 80%
Market capitalization -- MC: $4.98B vs. PWP: $1.17B
MC [@Investment Banks/Brokers] is valued at $4.98B. PWP’s [@Investment Banks/Brokers] market capitalization is $1.17B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry ranges from $928.5B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry is $14.56B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MC’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whilePWP’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • MC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • PWP’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, MC is a better buy in the long-term than PWP.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MC’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PWP’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • PWP’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, PWP is a better buy in the short-term than MC.

Price Growth

MC (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а -3.11% price change this week, while PWP (@Investment Banks/Brokers) price change was +0.06% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was -2.25%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.75%, and the average quarterly price growth was -6.61%.

Reported Earning Dates

MC is expected to report earnings on Jul 29, 2026.

PWP is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Banks/Brokers (-2.25% weekly)

These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MC($4.98B) has a higher market cap than PWP($1.17B). PWP has higher P/E ratio than MC: PWP (64.08) vs MC (24.08). MC YTD gains are higher at: -0.657 vs. PWP (-6.716). MC has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 290M vs. PWP (45.1M). MC has more cash in the bank: 153M vs. PWP (77.7M). PWP has less debt than MC: PWP (182M) vs MC (267M). MC has higher revenues than PWP: MC (1.53B) vs PWP (688M).
MCPWPMC / PWP
Capitalization4.98B1.17B426%
EBITDA290M45.1M643%
Gain YTD-0.657-6.71610%
P/E Ratio24.0864.0838%
Revenue1.53B688M222%
Total Cash153M77.7M197%
Total Debt267M182M147%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MC: Fundamental Ratings
MC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
91
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
11
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
55
SMR RATING
1..100
22
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
46
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
62
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
90

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MCPWP
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
73%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
74%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
PWP
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
DFUV55.100.48
+0.88%
Dimensional US Marketwide Value ETF
EUDV53.57N/A
N/A
ProShares MSCI Europe Dividend Gr ETF
USEW55.45N/A
N/A
Cambria US EW ETF
BSJS21.74-0.01
-0.05%
Invesco BulletShares 2028 HY Corp Bd ETF
WEA10.58-0.01
-0.09%
Western Asset Premier

PWP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PWP has been closely correlated with PIPR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PWP jumps, then PIPR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PWP
1D Price
Change %
PWP100%
+1.07%
PIPR - PWP
74%
Closely correlated
-0.04%
RJF - PWP
72%
Closely correlated
+0.51%
MC - PWP
66%
Closely correlated
-0.36%
EVR - PWP
66%
Loosely correlated
+0.62%
LAZ - PWP
64%
Loosely correlated
-1.47%
More