Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MCCRX vs NAESX
MCCRX vs NAESX Comparison
Open Charts MCCRX vs NAESX
MCCRX vs NAESX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MCCRX vs. NAESX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MCCRX is a Hold and NAESX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NAESX has more cash in the bank: 189B vs. MCCRX (596M). NAESX pays higher dividends than MCCRX: NAESX (1.07) vs MCCRX (0.03). MCCRX was incepted earlier than NAESX: MCCRX (12 years) vs NAESX (66 years). MCCRX (1.35) is less costly to investors than NAESX (0.17). MCCRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 40.00 vs. NAESX (17.00). MCCRX (0) and NAESX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. NAESX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 23.34 vs. MCCRX (10.67). NAESX return over 5 years is better than : 38.39 vs. MCCRX (5.31).
| MCCRX | NAESX | MCCRX / NAESX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 0.17 | 794% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 0.17 | 794% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 66 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.813 | 15.738 | 107% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 596M | 189B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.03 | 1.07 | 3% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.67 | 23.34 | 46% |
| Returns for 3 years | 18.50 | 48.12 | 38% |
| Returns for 5 years | 5.31 | 38.39 | 14% |
| Returns for 10 years | 41.23 | 157.36 | 26% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement