Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MCCVX vs PACIX
MCCVX vs PACIX Comparison
Open Charts MCCVX vs PACIX
NYLI MacKay Convertible
Price$19.93
Change+$0.07 (+0.35%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.62B
Columbia Convertible Securities A
Price$24.32
Change+$0.07 (+0.29%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.19B
MCCVX vs PACIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MCCVX vs. PACIX commentary
Sep 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MCCVX is a Hold and PACIX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MCCVX has more cash in the bank: 1.62B vs. PACIX (1.19B). MCCVX pays higher dividends than PACIX: MCCVX (2.11) vs PACIX (1.74). MCCVX was incepted earlier than PACIX: MCCVX (27 years) vs PACIX (38 years). MCCVX (1.93) is less costly to investors than PACIX (1.15). PACIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 108.00 vs. MCCVX (35.00). MCCVX has a lower initial minimum investment than PACIX: MCCVX (1000) vs PACIX (2000). MCCVX (1000) and PACIX (1000) have similar IRA initial investment minimum. PACIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 20.05 vs. MCCVX (11.66). MCCVX return over 5 years is better than : 5.10 vs. PACIX (2.72).
| MCCVX | PACIX | MCCVX / PACIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.93 | 1.08 | 179% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.93 | 1.15 | 168% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 38 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.397 | 12.580 | 83% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2000 | 50% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Net Assets | 1.62B | 1.19B | 136% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.11 | 1.74 | 121% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.66 | 20.05 | 58% |
| Returns for 3 years | 16.80 | 28.65 | 59% |
| Returns for 5 years | 5.10 | 2.72 | 188% |
| Returns for 10 years | 34.28 | 64.69 | 53% |