Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MCCVX vs PACIX
MCCVX vs PACIX Comparison
Open Charts MCCVX vs PACIX
MCCVX vs PACIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MCCVX vs. PACIX commentary
Sep 09, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MCCVX is a Hold and PACIX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MCCVX has more cash in the bank: 1.88B vs. PACIX (1.74B). PACIX (1.30) and MCCVX (1.27) have matching dividends . MCCVX was incepted earlier than PACIX: MCCVX (28 years) vs PACIX (39 years). MCCVX (1.91) is less costly to investors than PACIX (1.15). PACIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 212.00 vs. MCCVX (40.00). MCCVX has a lower initial minimum investment than PACIX: MCCVX (1000) vs PACIX (2000). MCCVX (1000) and PACIX (1000) have similar IRA initial investment minimum. PACIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 21.95 vs. MCCVX (15.42). PACIX return over 5 years is better than : 8.76 vs. MCCVX (-1.21).
| MCCVX | PACIX | MCCVX / PACIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.91 | 1.09 | 175% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.91 | 1.15 | 166% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 39 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.364 | 15.145 | 115% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2000 | 50% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Net Assets | 1.88B | 1.74B | 108% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.27 | 1.30 | 97% |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.42 | 21.95 | 70% |
| Returns for 3 years | 35.12 | 57.32 | 61% |
| Returns for 5 years | -1.21 | 8.76 | -14% |
| Returns for 10 years | 52.68 | 102.90 | 51% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement