Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MCCVX vs PACIX
MCCVX vs PACIX Comparison
Open Charts MCCVX vs PACIX
MCCVX vs PACIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MCCVX vs. PACIX commentary
Jun 19, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MCCVX is a Hold and PACIX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MCCVX (1.91B) and PACIX (1.86B) have equal amount of cash in the bank . MCCVX pays higher dividends than PACIX: MCCVX (1.32) vs PACIX (1.22). MCCVX was incepted earlier than PACIX: MCCVX (28 years) vs PACIX (39 years). MCCVX (1.91) is less costly to investors than PACIX (1.15). PACIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 212.00 vs. MCCVX (40.00). MCCVX has a lower initial minimum investment than PACIX: MCCVX (1000) vs PACIX (2000). MCCVX (1000) and PACIX (1000) have similar IRA initial investment minimum. PACIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 42.01 vs. MCCVX (24.18). PACIX return over 5 years is better than : 19.47 vs. MCCVX (4.38).
| MCCVX | PACIX | MCCVX / PACIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.91 | 1.08 | 177% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.91 | 1.15 | 166% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 39 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 19.770 | 23.185 | 85% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2000 | 50% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Net Assets | 1.91B | 1.86B | 103% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.32 | 1.22 | 108% |
| Returns for 1 year | 24.18 | 42.01 | 58% |
| Returns for 3 years | 39.81 | 67.70 | 59% |
| Returns for 5 years | 4.38 | 19.47 | 22% |
| Returns for 10 years | 65.53 | 131.67 | 50% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement