MCD
Price
$300.07
Change
+$3.06 (+1.03%)
Updated
Oct 13, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
211.95B
23 days until earnings call
NATH
Price
$107.00
Change
+$2.53 (+2.42%)
Updated
Oct 13, 03:51 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
427.23M
Interact to see
Advertisement

MCD vs NATH

Header iconMCD vs NATH Comparison
Open Charts MCD vs NATHBanner chart's image
McDonald's
Price$300.07
Change+$3.06 (+1.03%)
Volume$23.9K
Capitalization211.95B
Nathan's Famous
Price$107.00
Change+$2.53 (+2.42%)
Volume$100
Capitalization427.23M
MCD vs NATH Comparison Chart in %
MCD
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NATH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MCD vs. NATH commentary
Oct 13, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MCD is a StrongBuy and NATH is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 13, 2025
Stock price -- (MCD: $297.01 vs. NATH: $104.47)
Brand notoriety: MCD: Notable vs. NATH: Not notable
Both companies represent the Restaurants industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MCD: 132% vs. NATH: 119%
Market capitalization -- MCD: $211.95B vs. NATH: $427.23M
MCD [@Restaurants] is valued at $211.95B. NATH’s [@Restaurants] market capitalization is $427.23M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Restaurants] industry ranges from $211.95B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Restaurants] industry is $7.56B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MCD’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileNATH’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • MCD’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • NATH’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, MCD is a better buy in the long-term than NATH.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MCD’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NATH’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MCD’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • NATH’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MCD is a better buy in the short-term than NATH.

Price Growth

MCD (@Restaurants) experienced а -1.32% price change this week, while NATH (@Restaurants) price change was -7.14% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Restaurants industry was -1.53%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.05%, and the average quarterly price growth was +0.77%.

Reported Earning Dates

MCD is expected to report earnings on Nov 05, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Restaurants (-1.53% weekly)

The industry includes companies that operate full-service restaurants, fast food restaurants, cafeterias and snack bars. McDonald`s Corporation, Starbucks Corporation, YUM! Brands, Inc. and Restaurant Brands International Inc. are some of the largest U.S. restaurant-owning companies in terms of market capitalization. While restaurant spending could be viewed as discretionary for consumers, some companies in the business have been able to weather economic cycles by establishing strong loyalty among customers over the years. Many of them also have a strong global presence as well.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MCD($212B) has a higher market cap than NATH($427M). MCD has higher P/E ratio than NATH: MCD (25.45) vs NATH (18.14). NATH YTD gains are higher at: 34.804 vs. MCD (4.221). MCD has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 14.2B vs. NATH (37M). MCD has more cash in the bank: 1.88B vs. NATH (26.9M). NATH has less debt than MCD: NATH (54.9M) vs MCD (55.9B). MCD has higher revenues than NATH: MCD (26.1B) vs NATH (150M).
MCDNATHMCD / NATH
Capitalization212B427M49,649%
EBITDA14.2B37M38,378%
Gain YTD4.22134.80412%
P/E Ratio25.4518.14140%
Revenue26.1B150M17,400%
Total Cash1.88B26.9M6,974%
Total Debt55.9B54.9M101,821%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MCD vs NATH: Fundamental Ratings
MCD
NATH
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8536
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
62
Fair valued
69
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2114
SMR RATING
1..100
840
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5953
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4831
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
7550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MCD's Valuation (62) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as NATH (69). This means that MCD’s stock grew similarly to NATH’s over the last 12 months.

NATH's Profit vs Risk Rating (14) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as MCD (21). This means that NATH’s stock grew similarly to MCD’s over the last 12 months.

MCD's SMR Rating (8) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as NATH (40). This means that MCD’s stock grew similarly to NATH’s over the last 12 months.

NATH's Price Growth Rating (53) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as MCD (59). This means that NATH’s stock grew similarly to MCD’s over the last 12 months.

NATH's P/E Growth Rating (31) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as MCD (48). This means that NATH’s stock grew similarly to MCD’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MCDNATH
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
48%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
46%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
70%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
44%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
50%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
43%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
61%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
37%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
53%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
40%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
53%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 20 days ago
42%
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
68%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
40%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
51%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
41%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
57%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
29%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
69%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MCD
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NATH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
IVVYX25.27N/A
N/A
Macquarie International Core Eq Y
KAUAX6.25N/A
N/A
Federated Hermes Kaufmann A
VCAAX12.79N/A
N/A
VALIC Company I Asset Allocation
SVPSX85.95N/A
N/A
ProFunds Small Cap Value Svc
MDGCX29.22N/A
N/A
BlackRock Advantage Global Investor A

NATH and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NATH has been loosely correlated with LOCO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 38% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if NATH jumps, then LOCO could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NATH
1D Price
Change %
NATH100%
-1.13%
LOCO - NATH
38%
Loosely correlated
-1.90%
BROS - NATH
35%
Loosely correlated
-1.53%
RICK - NATH
32%
Poorly correlated
-5.87%
PZZA - NATH
30%
Poorly correlated
-3.79%
CMG - NATH
29%
Poorly correlated
-2.62%
More