NATH
Price
$101.66
Change
+$0.09 (+0.09%)
Updated
Jun 18 closing price
Capitalization
416.24M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
RICK
Price
$28.27
Change
+$0.77 (+2.80%)
Updated
Jun 18 closing price
Capitalization
216.11M
52 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

NATH vs RICK

NATH vs RICK Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
NATH vs. RICK commentary
Jun 21, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NATH is a Hold and RICK is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 21, 2026
Stock price -- (NATH: $101.66 vs. RICK: $28.27)
Brand notoriety: NATH and RICK are both not notable
Both companies represent the Restaurants industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: NATH: 124% vs. RICK: 193%
Market capitalization -- NATH: $416.24M vs. RICK: $216.11M
NATH [@Restaurants] is valued at $416.24M. RICK’s [@Restaurants] market capitalization is $216.11M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Restaurants] industry ranges from $197.95B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Restaurants] industry is $10.36B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

NATH’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileRICK’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • NATH’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • RICK’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, NATH is a better buy in the long-term than RICK.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

NATH’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RICK’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • NATH’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • RICK’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, NATH is a better buy in the short-term than RICK.

Price Growth

NATH (@Restaurants) experienced а +0.08% price change this week, while RICK (@Restaurants) price change was +5.36% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Restaurants industry was +1.51%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +9.46%, and the average quarterly price growth was +5.52%.

Reported Earning Dates

RICK is expected to report earnings on Aug 12, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Restaurants (+1.51% weekly)

The industry includes companies that operate full-service restaurants, fast food restaurants, cafeterias and snack bars. McDonald`s Corporation, Starbucks Corporation, YUM! Brands, Inc. and Restaurant Brands International Inc. are some of the largest U.S. restaurant-owning companies in terms of market capitalization. While restaurant spending could be viewed as discretionary for consumers, some companies in the business have been able to weather economic cycles by establishing strong loyalty among customers over the years. Many of them also have a strong global presence as well.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NATH($416M) has a higher market cap than RICK($216M). RICK (21.53) and NATH (20.96) have similar P/E ratio . RICK YTD gains are higher at: 19.376 vs. NATH (9.188). NATH has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 33.8M vs. RICK (29.5M). NATH has less debt than RICK: NATH (53M) vs RICK (278M). RICK has higher revenues than NATH: RICK (282M) vs NATH (158M).
NATHRICKNATH / RICK
Capitalization416M216M193%
EBITDA33.8M29.5M115%
Gain YTD9.18819.37647%
P/E Ratio20.9621.5397%
Revenue158M282M56%
Total Cash24.5MN/A-
Total Debt53M278M19%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
NATH vs RICK: Fundamental Ratings
NATH
RICK
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3041
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
26
Undervalued
36
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
22100
SMR RATING
1..100
4192
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5443
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4098
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

NATH's Valuation (26) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as RICK (36) in the Movies Or Entertainment industry. This means that NATH’s stock grew similarly to RICK’s over the last 12 months.

NATH's Profit vs Risk Rating (22) in the Restaurants industry is significantly better than the same rating for RICK (100) in the Movies Or Entertainment industry. This means that NATH’s stock grew significantly faster than RICK’s over the last 12 months.

NATH's SMR Rating (41) in the Restaurants industry is somewhat better than the same rating for RICK (92) in the Movies Or Entertainment industry. This means that NATH’s stock grew somewhat faster than RICK’s over the last 12 months.

RICK's Price Growth Rating (43) in the Movies Or Entertainment industry is in the same range as NATH (54) in the Restaurants industry. This means that RICK’s stock grew similarly to NATH’s over the last 12 months.

NATH's P/E Growth Rating (40) in the Restaurants industry is somewhat better than the same rating for RICK (98) in the Movies Or Entertainment industry. This means that NATH’s stock grew somewhat faster than RICK’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
NATHRICK
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
43%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
44%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
56%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
68%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
65%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
51%
Bearish Trend 18 days ago
78%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
43%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
75%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
NATH
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
RICK
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
DBMZX23.670.72
+3.14%
BNY Mellon Sm/Md Cp Gr Z
JGRRX22.080.44
+2.03%
JAG Large Cap Growth R
HTSCX11.730.19
+1.65%
Hartford Small Cap Value C
MEMIX54.870.78
+1.44%
MFS Emerging Markets Equity I
DQIYX40.480.33
+0.82%
BNY Mellon Equity Income Fund Y

NATH and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that NATH and RICK have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NATH and RICK's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NATH
1D Price
Change %
NATH100%
+0.09%
RICK - NATH
30%
Poorly correlated
+2.80%
MCD - NATH
28%
Poorly correlated
-1.84%
CAKE - NATH
25%
Poorly correlated
+2.21%
YUM - NATH
25%
Poorly correlated
-1.35%
SHAK - NATH
24%
Poorly correlated
+0.49%
More