MCD
Price
$292.68
Change
+$2.45 (+0.84%)
Updated
Dec 20 closing price
38 days until earnings call
QSR
Price
$66.78
Change
+$1.26 (+1.92%)
Updated
Dec 20, 04:59 PM (EDT)
52 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

MCD vs QSR

Header iconMCD vs QSR Comparison
Open Charts MCD vs QSRBanner chart's image
McDonald's
Price$292.68
Change+$2.45 (+0.84%)
Volume$7.68M
CapitalizationN/A
Restaurant Brands International
Price$66.78
Change+$1.26 (+1.92%)
Volume$24.39K
CapitalizationN/A
MCD vs QSR Comparison Chart
Loading...
MCD
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
QSR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MCD vs. QSR commentary
Dec 22, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MCD is a Hold and QSR is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 22, 2024
Stock price -- (MCD: $292.68 vs. QSR: $66.77)
Brand notoriety: MCD: Notable vs. QSR: Not notable
Both companies represent the Restaurants industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MCD: 201% vs. QSR: 105%
Market capitalization -- MCD: $209.74B vs. QSR: $21.71B
MCD [@Restaurants] is valued at $209.74B. QSR’s [@Restaurants] market capitalization is $21.71B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Restaurants] industry ranges from $209.74B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Restaurants] industry is $8.18B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MCD’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileQSR’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • MCD’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • QSR’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, MCD is a better buy in the long-term than QSR.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MCD’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while QSR’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MCD’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 7 bearish.
  • QSR’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, QSR is a better buy in the short-term than MCD.

Price Growth

MCD (@Restaurants) experienced а -1.32% price change this week, while QSR (@Restaurants) price change was -1.34% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Restaurants industry was -2.31%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.90%, and the average quarterly price growth was +14.46%.

Reported Earning Dates

MCD is expected to report earnings on Jan 29, 2025.

QSR is expected to report earnings on Feb 12, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Restaurants (-2.31% weekly)

The industry includes companies that operate full-service restaurants, fast food restaurants, cafeterias and snack bars. McDonald`s Corporation, Starbucks Corporation, YUM! Brands, Inc. and Restaurant Brands International Inc. are some of the largest U.S. restaurant-owning companies in terms of market capitalization. While restaurant spending could be viewed as discretionary for consumers, some companies in the business have been able to weather economic cycles by establishing strong loyalty among customers over the years. Many of them also have a strong global presence as well.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MCD($210B) has a higher market cap than QSR($21.7B). MCD has higher P/E ratio than QSR: MCD (25.70) vs QSR (16.73). MCD YTD gains are higher at: 1.100 vs. QSR (-11.696). MCD has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 13.8B vs. QSR (2.47B). QSR has less debt than MCD: QSR (16B) vs MCD (53.4B). MCD has higher revenues than QSR: MCD (25.9B) vs QSR (7.93B).
MCDQSRMCD / QSR
Capitalization210B21.7B968%
EBITDA13.8B2.47B559%
Gain YTD1.100-11.696-9%
P/E Ratio25.7016.73154%
Revenue25.9B7.93B327%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt53.4B16B334%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MCD vs QSR: Fundamental Ratings
MCD
QSR
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7957
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
22
Undervalued
20
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1763
SMR RATING
1..100
823
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5071
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5576
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

QSR's Valuation (20) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as MCD (22). This means that QSR’s stock grew similarly to MCD’s over the last 12 months.

MCD's Profit vs Risk Rating (17) in the Restaurants industry is somewhat better than the same rating for QSR (63). This means that MCD’s stock grew somewhat faster than QSR’s over the last 12 months.

MCD's SMR Rating (8) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as QSR (23). This means that MCD’s stock grew similarly to QSR’s over the last 12 months.

MCD's Price Growth Rating (50) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as QSR (71). This means that MCD’s stock grew similarly to QSR’s over the last 12 months.

MCD's P/E Growth Rating (55) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as QSR (76). This means that MCD’s stock grew similarly to QSR’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MCDQSR
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
47%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
55%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
46%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
38%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
68%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
40%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
55%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
45%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
54%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 18 days ago
47%
Bullish Trend 19 days ago
57%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
43%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
56%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
30%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
38%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
60%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
MCD
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
QSR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GLPI47.080.62
+1.33%
Gaming and Leisure Properties
OPAL2.99-0.02
-0.66%
OPAL Fuels
LEU66.80-1.43
-2.10%
Centrus Energy Corp
HUBG43.07-2.00
-4.44%
Hub Group
YGMZ0.88-0.07
-7.37%
MingZhu Logistics Holdings Limited

QSR and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QSR has been loosely correlated with FRSH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 44% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if QSR jumps, then FRSH could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To QSR
1D Price
Change %
QSR100%
+2.82%
FRSH - QSR
44%
Loosely correlated
-0.45%
TXRH - QSR
44%
Loosely correlated
-0.81%
YUM - QSR
43%
Loosely correlated
+1.53%
JACK - QSR
40%
Loosely correlated
+5.22%
WEN - QSR
39%
Loosely correlated
+0.48%
More