Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MCDCX vs RNWHX
MCDCX vs RNWHX Comparison
Open Charts MCDCX vs RNWHX
BlackRock Emerging Mkts Inv C
Price$22.77
Change+$0.12 (+0.53%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.16B
American Funds New World R5E
Price$93.84
Change+$0.59 (+0.63%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets74.08B
MCDCX vs RNWHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MCDCX vs. RNWHX commentary
Sep 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MCDCX is a Buy and RNWHX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 74.1B vs. MCDCX (2.16B). MCDCX pays higher dividends than RNWHX: MCDCX (1.06) vs RNWHX (0.97). MCDCX was incepted earlier than RNWHX: MCDCX (31 years) vs RNWHX (10 years). MCDCX (2.09) is less costly to investors than RNWHX (0.72). MCDCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 141.00 vs. RNWHX (37.00). RNWHX has a lower initial minimum investment than MCDCX: RNWHX (250) vs MCDCX (1000). RNWHX (17.32) and MCDCX (16.72) have marching annual gain over last year. RNWHX return over 5 years is better than : 30.80 vs. MCDCX (8.83).
| MCDCX | RNWHX | MCDCX / RNWHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.87 | 0.72 | 260% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.09 | 0.72 | 290% |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 21.328 | 23.441 | 91% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 100 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.16B | 74.1B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.06 | 0.97 | 110% |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.72 | 17.32 | 97% |
| Returns for 3 years | 33.35 | 49.80 | 67% |
| Returns for 5 years | 8.83 | 30.80 | 29% |
| Returns for 10 years | 79.73 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers