Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MCEIX vs RNWAX
MCEIX vs RNWAX Comparison
Open Charts MCEIX vs RNWAX
MCEIX vs RNWAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MCEIX vs. RNWAX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MCEIX is a Hold and RNWAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWAX has more cash in the bank: 90.9B vs. MCEIX (450M). RNWAX pays higher dividends than MCEIX: RNWAX (0.49) vs MCEIX (0.46). MCEIX was incepted earlier than RNWAX: MCEIX (11 years) vs RNWAX (24 years). RNWAX (1.66) is less costly to investors than MCEIX (1.03). RNWAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 46.00 vs. MCEIX (25.00). RNWAX has a lower initial minimum investment than MCEIX: RNWAX (250) vs MCEIX (1000000). MCEIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 63.87 vs. RNWAX (29.72). MCEIX return over 5 years is better than : 30.50 vs. RNWAX (15.20).
| MCEIX | RNWAX | MCEIX / RNWAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 1.66 | 58% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.03 | 1.66 | 62% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 31.492 | 18.218 | 173% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 450M | 90.9B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.46 | 0.49 | 94% |
| Returns for 1 year | 63.87 | 29.72 | 215% |
| Returns for 3 years | 83.76 | 52.55 | 159% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.50 | 15.20 | 201% |
| Returns for 10 years | 186.03 | 121.98 | 153% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement