Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MCEIX vs RNWHX
MCEIX vs RNWHX Comparison
Open Charts MCEIX vs RNWHX
MCEIX vs RNWHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MCEIX vs. RNWHX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MCEIX is a Hold and RNWHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 90.7B vs. MCEIX (416M). RNWHX pays higher dividends than MCEIX: RNWHX (1.14) vs MCEIX (0.40). MCEIX was incepted earlier than RNWHX: MCEIX (11 years) vs RNWHX (11 years). MCEIX (1.03) is less costly to investors than RNWHX (0.72). RNWHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 46.00 vs. MCEIX (25.00). RNWHX has a lower initial minimum investment than MCEIX: RNWHX (250) vs MCEIX (1000000). MCEIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 48.60 vs. RNWHX (19.47). MCEIX return over 5 years is better than : 22.33 vs. RNWHX (14.04).
| MCEIX | RNWHX | MCEIX / RNWHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 0.72 | 133% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.03 | 0.72 | 143% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 22.973 | 12.651 | 182% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 416M | 90.7B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.40 | 1.14 | 35% |
| Returns for 1 year | 48.60 | 19.47 | 250% |
| Returns for 3 years | 64.60 | 43.67 | 148% |
| Returns for 5 years | 22.33 | 14.04 | 159% |
| Returns for 10 years | 146.02 | 107.31 | 136% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement