Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MCFGX vs RGACX
MCFGX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts MCFGX vs RGACX
MCFGX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MCFGX vs. RGACX commentary
Jun 20, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MCFGX is a Hold and RGACX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 361B vs. MCFGX (3.91B). MCFGX (0.00) and RGACX (0.00) have matching dividends . MCFGX was incepted earlier than RGACX: MCFGX (28 years) vs RGACX (24 years). MCFGX (1.80) is less costly to investors than RGACX (0.93). RGACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. MCFGX (29.00). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than MCFGX: RGACX (250) vs MCFGX (1000). RGACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.59 vs. MCFGX (-20.01). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 19.23 vs. MCFGX (-45.11).
| MCFGX | RGACX | MCFGX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.67 | 0.93 | 180% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.80 | 0.93 | 194% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.016 | 9.116 | 121% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.91B | 361B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -20.01 | 11.59 | -173% |
| Returns for 3 years | -12.48 | 45.05 | -28% |
| Returns for 5 years | -45.11 | 19.23 | -235% |
| Returns for 10 years | -16.80 | 107.89 | -16% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers