Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MCFOX vs RGACX
MCFOX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts MCFOX vs RGACX
BlackRock Large Cap Focus Growth Inv C
Price$5.54
Change-$0.08 (-1.42%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.84B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$82.27
Change-$0.77 (-0.93%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets327.53B
MCFOX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MCFOX vs. RGACX commentary
Aug 30, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MCFOX is a Buy and RGACX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 328B vs. MCFOX (1.84B). RGACX pays higher dividends than MCFOX: RGACX (0.07) vs MCFOX (0.00). MCFOX was incepted earlier than RGACX: MCFOX (26 years) vs RGACX (23 years). MCFOX (1.79) is less costly to investors than RGACX (0.94). MCFOX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. RGACX (25.00). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than MCFOX: RGACX (250) vs MCFOX (1000). RGACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.91 vs. MCFOX (7.66). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 34.48 vs. MCFOX (15.16).
| MCFOX | RGACX | MCFOX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.67 | 0.94 | 178% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.79 | 0.94 | 190% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.079 | 14.280 | 8% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.84B | 328B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.07 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.66 | 13.91 | 55% |
| Returns for 3 years | 54.40 | 53.48 | 102% |
| Returns for 5 years | 15.16 | 34.48 | 44% |
| Returns for 10 years | 124.80 | 99.45 | 125% |