Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MCFOX vs RGACX
MCFOX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts MCFOX vs RGACX
MCFOX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MCFOX vs. RGACX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MCFOX is a Hold and RGACX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 338B vs. MCFOX (1.88B). MCFOX (0.00) and RGACX (0.00) have matching dividends . MCFOX was incepted earlier than RGACX: MCFOX (26 years) vs RGACX (24 years). MCFOX (1.76) is less costly to investors than RGACX (0.93). RGACX (32.00) and MCFOX (31.00) have comparable annual turnover. RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than MCFOX: RGACX (250) vs MCFOX (1000). RGACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.24 vs. MCFOX (-0.18). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 22.53 vs. MCFOX (3.71).
| MCFOX | RGACX | MCFOX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.67 | 0.93 | 180% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.76 | 0.93 | 189% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.496 | 10.291 | 151% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.88B | 338B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.18 | 14.24 | -1% |
| Returns for 3 years | 35.68 | 51.07 | 70% |
| Returns for 5 years | 3.71 | 22.53 | 16% |
| Returns for 10 years | 124.50 | 107.79 | 116% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers