Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MCFOX vs RGACX
MCFOX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts MCFOX vs RGACX
MCFOX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MCFOX vs. RGACX commentary
Aug 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MCFOX is a StrongBuy and RGACX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 342B vs. MCFOX (1.84B). MCFOX (0.00) and RGACX (0.00) have matching dividends . MCFOX was incepted earlier than RGACX: MCFOX (26 years) vs RGACX (24 years). MCFOX (1.76) is less costly to investors than RGACX (0.93). RGACX (32.00) and MCFOX (31.00) have comparable annual turnover. RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than MCFOX: RGACX (250) vs MCFOX (1000). RGACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.90 vs. MCFOX (-27.02). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 14.75 vs. MCFOX (-26.89).
| MCFOX | RGACX | MCFOX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.67 | 0.93 | 180% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.76 | 0.93 | 189% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -17.975 | 9.193 | -196% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.84B | 342B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -27.02 | 4.90 | -552% |
| Returns for 3 years | -4.57 | 44.95 | -10% |
| Returns for 5 years | -26.89 | 14.75 | -182% |
| Returns for 10 years | 52.11 | 96.44 | 54% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement