Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MCFOX vs RGAGX
MCFOX vs RGAGX Comparison
Open Charts MCFOX vs RGAGX
MCFOX vs RGAGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MCFOX vs. RGAGX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MCFOX is a Buy and RGAGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAGX has more cash in the bank: 353B vs. MCFOX (1.73B). RGAGX pays higher dividends than MCFOX: RGAGX (0.51) vs MCFOX (0.00). MCFOX was incepted earlier than RGAGX: MCFOX (27 years) vs RGAGX (17 years). MCFOX (1.76) is less costly to investors than RGAGX (0.29). MCFOX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 99.00 vs. RGAGX (32.00). RGAGX has a lower initial minimum investment than MCFOX: RGAGX (250) vs MCFOX (1000). RGAGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.49 vs. MCFOX (-31.11). RGAGX return over 5 years is better than : 15.00 vs. MCFOX (-30.12).
| MCFOX | RGAGX | MCFOX / RGAGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.67 | 0.29 | 576% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.76 | 0.29 | 607% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -19.008 | 9.321 | -204% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.73B | 353B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.51 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -31.11 | 0.49 | -6,358% |
| Returns for 3 years | -7.98 | 44.65 | -18% |
| Returns for 5 years | -30.12 | 15.00 | -201% |
| Returns for 10 years | 53.73 | 110.30 | 49% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers