Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MCFOX vs RGAGX
MCFOX vs RGAGX Comparison
Open Charts MCFOX vs RGAGX
MCFOX vs RGAGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MCFOX vs. RGAGX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MCFOX is a Hold and RGAGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAGX has more cash in the bank: 361B vs. MCFOX (1.8B). RGAGX pays higher dividends than MCFOX: RGAGX (0.51) vs MCFOX (0.00). MCFOX was incepted earlier than RGAGX: MCFOX (26 years) vs RGAGX (17 years). MCFOX (1.76) is less costly to investors than RGAGX (0.29). RGAGX (32.00) and MCFOX (31.00) have comparable annual turnover. RGAGX has a lower initial minimum investment than MCFOX: RGAGX (250) vs MCFOX (1000). RGAGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.05 vs. MCFOX (-5.81). RGAGX return over 5 years is better than : 17.49 vs. MCFOX (-7.44).
| MCFOX | RGAGX | MCFOX / RGAGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.67 | 0.29 | 576% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.76 | 0.29 | 607% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.537 | 6.516 | 162% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.8B | 361B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.51 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -5.81 | 9.05 | -64% |
| Returns for 3 years | 27.38 | 47.07 | 58% |
| Returns for 5 years | -7.44 | 17.49 | -43% |
| Returns for 10 years | 124.79 | 117.26 | 106% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement