Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MCFOX vs RGEBX
MCFOX vs RGEBX Comparison
Open Charts MCFOX vs RGEBX
MCFOX vs RGEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MCFOX vs. RGEBX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MCFOX is a Hold and RGEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGEBX has more cash in the bank: 338B vs. MCFOX (1.88B). MCFOX (0.00) and RGEBX (0.00) have matching dividends . MCFOX was incepted earlier than RGEBX: MCFOX (26 years) vs RGEBX (12 years). MCFOX (1.76) is less costly to investors than RGEBX (1.08). RGEBX (32.00) and MCFOX (31.00) have comparable annual turnover. RGEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than MCFOX: RGEBX (250) vs MCFOX (1000). RGEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.94 vs. MCFOX (-0.18). RGEBX return over 5 years is better than : 21.28 vs. MCFOX (3.71).
| MCFOX | RGEBX | MCFOX / RGEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.67 | 1.08 | 155% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.76 | 1.08 | 163% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.496 | 10.227 | 152% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.88B | 338B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.18 | 13.94 | -1% |
| Returns for 3 years | 35.68 | 50.06 | 71% |
| Returns for 5 years | 3.71 | 21.28 | 17% |
| Returns for 10 years | 124.50 | 103.93 | 120% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement