Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MCGFX vs RGACX
MCGFX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts MCGFX vs RGACX
AMG Montrusco Bolton Large Cap Growth N
Price$13.81
Change-$0.10 (-0.72%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets211.86M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$83.16
Change+$0.19 (+0.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets331.65B
MCGFX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MCGFX vs. RGACX commentary
Sep 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MCGFX is a Buy and RGACX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 332B vs. MCGFX (212M). RGACX pays higher dividends than MCGFX: RGACX (0.07) vs MCGFX (0.00). MCGFX was incepted earlier than RGACX: MCGFX (31 years) vs RGACX (23 years). MCGFX (0.97) and RGACX (0.94) have similar cost to investors . MCGFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 83.00 vs. RGACX (25.00). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than MCGFX: RGACX (250) vs MCGFX (2000). RGACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.83 vs. MCGFX (6.75). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 40.02 vs. MCGFX (-37.68).
| MCGFX | RGACX | MCGFX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 0.94 | 97% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.97 | 0.94 | 103% |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.644 | 15.516 | 88% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 212M | 332B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.07 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.75 | 17.83 | 38% |
| Returns for 3 years | 33.09 | 58.53 | 57% |
| Returns for 5 years | -37.68 | 40.02 | -94% |
| Returns for 10 years | -45.33 | 95.93 | -47% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement