Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MCGFX vs RGACX
MCGFX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts MCGFX vs RGACX
MCGFX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MCGFX vs. RGACX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MCGFX is a Buy and RGACX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 357B vs. MCGFX (211M). MCGFX (0.00) and RGACX (0.00) have matching dividends . MCGFX was incepted earlier than RGACX: MCGFX (32 years) vs RGACX (24 years). MCGFX (0.96) and RGACX (0.93) have similar cost to investors . MCGFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 97.00 vs. RGACX (32.00). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than MCGFX: RGACX (250) vs MCGFX (2000). RGACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.68 vs. MCGFX (-13.40). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 13.46 vs. MCGFX (-28.68).
| MCGFX | RGACX | MCGFX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 0.93 | 97% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 0.93 | 103% |
| Fund Existence | 32 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.182 | 6.959 | 261% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 211M | 357B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -13.40 | 3.68 | -364% |
| Returns for 3 years | 5.50 | 37.13 | 15% |
| Returns for 5 years | -28.68 | 13.46 | -213% |
| Returns for 10 years | -41.83 | 97.58 | -43% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement