Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MCGFX vs RGAGX
MCGFX vs RGAGX Comparison
Open Charts MCGFX vs RGAGX
AMG Montrusco Bolton Large Cap Growth N
Price$13.81
Change-$0.10 (-0.72%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets211.86M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R6
Price$86.49
Change+$0.20 (+0.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets331.65B
MCGFX vs RGAGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MCGFX vs. RGAGX commentary
Sep 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MCGFX is a Buy and RGAGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAGX has more cash in the bank: 332B vs. MCGFX (212M). RGAGX pays higher dividends than MCGFX: RGAGX (0.59) vs MCGFX (0.00). MCGFX was incepted earlier than RGAGX: MCGFX (31 years) vs RGAGX (16 years). MCGFX (0.97) is less costly to investors than RGAGX (0.30). MCGFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 83.00 vs. RGAGX (25.00). RGAGX has a lower initial minimum investment than MCGFX: RGAGX (250) vs MCGFX (2000). RGAGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.90 vs. MCGFX (6.75). RGAGX return over 5 years is better than : 44.13 vs. MCGFX (-37.68).
| MCGFX | RGAGX | MCGFX / RGAGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 0.30 | 303% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.97 | 0.30 | 323% |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.644 | 16.016 | 85% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 212M | 332B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.59 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.75 | 18.90 | 36% |
| Returns for 3 years | 33.09 | 61.40 | 54% |
| Returns for 5 years | -37.68 | 44.13 | -85% |
| Returns for 10 years | -45.33 | 102.81 | -44% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement