Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MCGFX vs RGAGX
MCGFX vs RGAGX Comparison
Open Charts MCGFX vs RGAGX
AMG Montrusco Bolton Large Cap Growth N
Price$13.92
Change-$0.03 (-0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets213.49M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R6
Price$85.36
Change-$0.06 (-0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets329.22B
MCGFX vs RGAGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MCGFX vs. RGAGX commentary
Aug 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MCGFX is a StrongBuy and RGAGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAGX has more cash in the bank: 329B vs. MCGFX (213M). RGAGX pays higher dividends than MCGFX: RGAGX (0.60) vs MCGFX (0.00). MCGFX was incepted earlier than RGAGX: MCGFX (31 years) vs RGAGX (16 years). MCGFX (0.97) is less costly to investors than RGAGX (0.30). MCGFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 83.00 vs. RGAGX (25.00). RGAGX has a lower initial minimum investment than MCGFX: RGAGX (250) vs MCGFX (2000). RGAGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.11 vs. MCGFX (6.00). RGAGX return over 5 years is better than : 46.14 vs. MCGFX (-35.48).
| MCGFX | RGAGX | MCGFX / RGAGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 0.30 | 303% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.97 | 0.30 | 323% |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.971 | 14.500 | 96% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 213M | 329B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.60 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.00 | 15.11 | 40% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.95 | 43.78 | 41% |
| Returns for 5 years | -35.48 | 46.14 | -77% |
| Returns for 10 years | -48.56 | 90.14 | -54% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement