Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MCGFX vs RGAGX
MCGFX vs RGAGX Comparison
Open Charts MCGFX vs RGAGX
MCGFX vs RGAGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MCGFX vs. RGAGX commentary
Jun 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MCGFX is a Buy and RGAGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAGX has more cash in the bank: 338B vs. MCGFX (201M). RGAGX pays higher dividends than MCGFX: RGAGX (0.51) vs MCGFX (0.00). MCGFX was incepted earlier than RGAGX: MCGFX (32 years) vs RGAGX (17 years). MCGFX (0.96) is less costly to investors than RGAGX (0.29). MCGFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 97.00 vs. RGAGX (32.00). RGAGX has a lower initial minimum investment than MCGFX: RGAGX (250) vs MCGFX (2000). RGAGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.41 vs. MCGFX (-12.91). RGAGX return over 5 years is better than : 27.14 vs. MCGFX (-26.71).
| MCGFX | RGAGX | MCGFX / RGAGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 0.29 | 310% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 0.29 | 331% |
| Fund Existence | 32 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.111 | 10.599 | 105% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 201M | 338B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.51 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -12.91 | 15.41 | -84% |
| Returns for 3 years | 3.86 | 55.31 | 7% |
| Returns for 5 years | -26.71 | 27.14 | -98% |
| Returns for 10 years | -44.51 | 117.06 | -38% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers