Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MCGFX vs RGAGX
MCGFX vs RGAGX Comparison
Open Charts MCGFX vs RGAGX
MCGFX vs RGAGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MCGFX vs. RGAGX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MCGFX is a Buy and RGAGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAGX has more cash in the bank: 357B vs. MCGFX (211M). RGAGX pays higher dividends than MCGFX: RGAGX (0.51) vs MCGFX (0.00). MCGFX was incepted earlier than RGAGX: MCGFX (32 years) vs RGAGX (17 years). MCGFX (0.96) is less costly to investors than RGAGX (0.29). MCGFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 97.00 vs. RGAGX (32.00). RGAGX has a lower initial minimum investment than MCGFX: RGAGX (250) vs MCGFX (2000). RGAGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.75 vs. MCGFX (-13.40). RGAGX return over 5 years is better than : 17.74 vs. MCGFX (-28.68).
| MCGFX | RGAGX | MCGFX / RGAGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 0.29 | 310% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 0.29 | 331% |
| Fund Existence | 32 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.182 | 7.335 | 248% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 211M | 357B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.51 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -13.40 | 4.75 | -282% |
| Returns for 3 years | 5.50 | 41.00 | 13% |
| Returns for 5 years | -28.68 | 17.74 | -162% |
| Returns for 10 years | -41.83 | 106.44 | -39% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers