MCHVY
Price
$21.45
Change
+$0.11 (+0.52%)
Updated
Jul 8 closing price
Capitalization
7.81B
PBKOF
Price
$13.79
Change
-$0.78 (-5.35%)
Updated
Aug 27 closing price
Capitalization
371.14M
Interact to see
Advertisement

MCHVY vs PBKOF

Header iconMCHVY vs PBKOF Comparison
Open Charts MCHVY vs PBKOFBanner chart's image
MGM China Holdings
Price$21.45
Change+$0.11 (+0.52%)
Volume$155
Capitalization7.81B
Pollard Banknote
Price$13.79
Change-$0.78 (-5.35%)
Volume$100
Capitalization371.14M
MCHVY vs PBKOF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
MCHVY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PBKOF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MCHVY vs. PBKOF commentary
Aug 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MCHVY is a Hold and PBKOF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 29, 2025
Stock price -- (MCHVY: $20.97 vs. PBKOF: $13.79)
Brand notoriety: MCHVY and PBKOF are both not notable
MCHVY represents the Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines, while PBKOF is part of the Casinos/Gaming industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MCHVY: 20% vs. PBKOF: 49%
Market capitalization -- MCHVY: $7.81B vs. PBKOF: $371.14M
MCHVY [@Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines] is valued at $7.81B. PBKOF’s [@Casinos/Gaming] market capitalization is $371.14M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines] industry ranges from $39.62B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Casinos/Gaming] industry ranges from $54.24B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines] industry is $5.89B. The average market capitalization across the [@Casinos/Gaming] industry is $5.61B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MCHVY’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whilePBKOF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • MCHVY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • PBKOF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, MCHVY is a better buy in the long-term than PBKOF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MCHVY’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PBKOF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MCHVY’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 0 bearish.
  • PBKOF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MCHVY is a better buy in the short-term than PBKOF.

Price Growth

MCHVY (@Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while PBKOF (@Casinos/Gaming) price change was -7.19% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines industry was +3.93%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.95%, and the average quarterly price growth was +12.94%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Casinos/Gaming industry was +1.70%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.73%, and the average quarterly price growth was +18.59%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines (+3.93% weekly)

The industry includes companies that operate and manage one or more of the following: lodging facilities (e.g. hotels and motels), resorts (e.g. ski resorts), spas, cruise ships and timeshare facilities. Marriott International, Inc., Carnival Corporation, Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc. and Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd. are some of the biggest names in this industry.

@Casinos/Gaming (+1.70% weekly)

Casinos/Gaming includes companies that operate casinos, gaming services, horse racing and harness racing facilities. Think Las Vegas Sands Corp., MGM Resorts International and Wynn Resorts, Ltd. In periods of strong economic growth, consumers tend to spend on discretionary/leisure activities like gambling or games; but consumption is likely to slow down when there’s economic sluggishness.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MCHVY($7.81B) has a higher market cap than PBKOF($371M). PBKOF has higher P/E ratio than MCHVY: PBKOF (14.56) vs MCHVY (12.34). MCHVY YTD gains are higher at: 49.314 vs. PBKOF (-14.348). MCHVY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 8.02B vs. PBKOF (113M). MCHVY has higher revenues than PBKOF: MCHVY (31.4B) vs PBKOF (582M).
MCHVYPBKOFMCHVY / PBKOF
Capitalization7.81B371M2,106%
EBITDA8.02B113M7,101%
Gain YTD49.314-14.348-344%
P/E Ratio12.3414.5685%
Revenue31.4B582M5,395%
Total CashN/A15.7M-
Total DebtN/A204M-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MCHVY vs PBKOF: Fundamental Ratings
MCHVY
PBKOF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
4787
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
19
Undervalued
34
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
6094
SMR RATING
1..100
100100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4485
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MCHVY's Valuation (19) in the null industry is in the same range as PBKOF (34). This means that MCHVY’s stock grew similarly to PBKOF’s over the last 12 months.

MCHVY's Profit vs Risk Rating (60) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PBKOF (94). This means that MCHVY’s stock grew somewhat faster than PBKOF’s over the last 12 months.

MCHVY's SMR Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as PBKOF (100). This means that MCHVY’s stock grew similarly to PBKOF’s over the last 12 months.

MCHVY's Price Growth Rating (44) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PBKOF (85). This means that MCHVY’s stock grew somewhat faster than PBKOF’s over the last 12 months.

MCHVY's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as PBKOF (100). This means that MCHVY’s stock grew similarly to PBKOF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MCHVYPBKOF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
62%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
54%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
62%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
65%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
50%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
62%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
52%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
57%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
46%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
57%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MCHVY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PBKOF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FTF6.460.04
+0.62%
Franklin Limited
MTGP44.320.09
+0.20%
WisdomTree Mortgage Plus Bond
QCAP23.140.02
+0.09%
FT Vest Nasdaq-100 Cnsrv Buffr ETF - Apr
SDOG60.14-0.10
-0.17%
ALPS Sector Dividend Dogs ETF
ZTAX24.83-0.11
-0.46%
X-Square Municipal Income Tax Free ETF

MCHVY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MCHVY and AAPI have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MCHVY and AAPI's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MCHVY
1D Price
Change %
MCHVY100%
N/A
AAPI - MCHVY
23%
Poorly correlated
-10.03%
MLCO - MCHVY
22%
Poorly correlated
+1.72%
WYNN - MCHVY
21%
Poorly correlated
+2.87%
SCHYY - MCHVY
20%
Poorly correlated
+0.96%
GXYEF - MCHVY
18%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

PBKOF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that PBKOF and NGCRF have been poorly correlated (+13% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PBKOF and NGCRF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PBKOF
1D Price
Change %
PBKOF100%
N/A
NGCRF - PBKOF
13%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MCHVY - PBKOF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PBTHF - PBKOF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PYTCF - PBKOF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PYTCY - PBKOF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More