Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MCINX vs PACIX
MCINX vs PACIX Comparison
Open Charts MCINX vs PACIX
MCINX vs PACIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MCINX vs. PACIX commentary
Sep 09, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MCINX is a Hold and PACIX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MCINX has more cash in the bank: 1.88B vs. PACIX (1.74B). MCINX pays higher dividends than PACIX: MCINX (1.71) vs PACIX (1.30). MCINX was incepted earlier than PACIX: MCINX (19 years) vs PACIX (39 years). MCINX (1.16) and PACIX (1.15) have similar cost to investors . PACIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 212.00 vs. MCINX (40.00). PACIX initial investment is less costly to investors than MCINX (5%) vs MCINX (5%). MCINX has a lower initial minimum investment than PACIX: MCINX (1000) vs PACIX (2000). MCINX (1000) and PACIX (1000) have similar IRA initial investment minimum. PACIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 21.95 vs. MCINX (16.52). PACIX return over 5 years is better than : 8.76 vs. MCINX (3.32).
| MCINX | PACIX | MCINX / PACIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.16 | 1.09 | 106% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.16 | 1.15 | 101% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 39 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.935 | 15.145 | 118% |
| Front Load | 5% | 6% | 87% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2000 | 50% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Net Assets | 1.88B | 1.74B | 108% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.71 | 1.30 | 131% |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.52 | 21.95 | 75% |
| Returns for 3 years | 38.59 | 57.32 | 67% |
| Returns for 5 years | 3.32 | 8.76 | 38% |
| Returns for 10 years | 64.38 | 102.90 | 63% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement