Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MCINX vs PACIX
MCINX vs PACIX Comparison
Open Charts MCINX vs PACIX
MCINX vs PACIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MCINX vs. PACIX commentary
Jun 19, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MCINX is a Hold and PACIX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MCINX (1.89B) and PACIX (1.86B) have equal amount of cash in the bank . MCINX pays higher dividends than PACIX: MCINX (1.80) vs PACIX (1.22). MCINX was incepted earlier than PACIX: MCINX (18 years) vs PACIX (39 years). MCINX (1.16) and PACIX (1.15) have similar cost to investors . PACIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 212.00 vs. MCINX (40.00). PACIX initial investment is less costly to investors than MCINX (5%) vs MCINX (5%). MCINX has a lower initial minimum investment than PACIX: MCINX (1000) vs PACIX (2000). MCINX (1000) and PACIX (1000) have similar IRA initial investment minimum. PACIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 42.01 vs. MCINX (25.33). PACIX return over 5 years is better than : 19.47 vs. MCINX (9.13).
| MCINX | PACIX | MCINX / PACIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.16 | 1.08 | 107% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.16 | 1.15 | 101% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 39 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 20.146 | 23.185 | 87% |
| Front Load | 5% | 6% | 87% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2000 | 50% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Net Assets | 1.89B | 1.86B | 102% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.80 | 1.22 | 147% |
| Returns for 1 year | 25.33 | 42.01 | 60% |
| Returns for 3 years | 43.35 | 67.70 | 64% |
| Returns for 5 years | 9.13 | 19.47 | 47% |
| Returns for 10 years | 77.95 | 131.67 | 59% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement