Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MCISX vs VFSNX
MCISX vs VFSNX Comparison
Open Charts MCISX vs VFSNX
MCISX vs VFSNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MCISX vs. VFSNX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MCISX is a Hold and VFSNX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VFSNX has more cash in the bank: 14.5B vs. MCISX (4.53B). VFSNX pays higher dividends than MCISX: VFSNX (3.08) vs MCISX (0.89). MCISX was incepted earlier than VFSNX: MCISX (19 years) vs VFSNX (17 years). MCISX (3.49) is less costly to investors than VFSNX (0.08). MCISX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 49.00 vs. VFSNX (27.00). MCISX has a lower initial minimum investment than VFSNX: MCISX (2500) vs VFSNX (5000000). VFSNX (11.92) and MCISX (11.38) have marching annual gain over last year. VFSNX (19.94) and MCISX (19.91) have equivalent 5 years return.
| MCISX | VFSNX | MCISX / VFSNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.10 | 0.08 | 2,625% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 3.49 | 0.08 | 4,363% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.601 | 10.565 | 100% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 5000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.53B | 14.5B | 31% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.89 | 3.08 | 29% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.38 | 11.92 | 95% |
| Returns for 3 years | 63.69 | 49.94 | 128% |
| Returns for 5 years | 19.91 | 19.94 | 100% |
| Returns for 10 years | 104.62 | 84.24 | 124% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement