Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MCLOX vs RLBAX
MCLOX vs RLBAX Comparison
Open Charts MCLOX vs RLBAX
MCLOX vs RLBAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MCLOX vs. RLBAX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MCLOX is a Buy and RLBAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBAX has more cash in the bank: 279B vs. MCLOX (17.6B). MCLOX pays higher dividends than RLBAX: MCLOX (1.88) vs RLBAX (1.14). MCLOX was incepted earlier than RLBAX: MCLOX (32 years) vs RLBAX (24 years). MCLOX (1.94) is less costly to investors than RLBAX (1.32). MCLOX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 138.00 vs. RLBAX (50.00). RLBAX has a lower initial minimum investment than MCLOX: RLBAX (250) vs MCLOX (1000). RLBAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.80 vs. MCLOX (10.45). RLBAX return over 5 years is better than : 31.17 vs. MCLOX (-6.44).
| MCLOX | RLBAX | MCLOX / RLBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.91 | 1.32 | 145% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.94 | 1.32 | 147% |
| Fund Existence | 32 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.756 | 9.354 | 83% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 17.6B | 279B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.88 | 1.14 | 165% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.45 | 16.80 | 62% |
| Returns for 3 years | 26.88 | 42.23 | 64% |
| Returns for 5 years | -6.44 | 31.17 | -21% |
| Returns for 10 years | 18.04 | 77.06 | 23% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement