Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MCLOX vs RLBAX
MCLOX vs RLBAX Comparison
Open Charts MCLOX vs RLBAX
MCLOX vs RLBAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MCLOX vs. RLBAX commentary
Jul 22, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MCLOX is a Buy and RLBAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBAX has more cash in the bank: 288B vs. MCLOX (17.2B). MCLOX pays higher dividends than RLBAX: MCLOX (1.87) vs RLBAX (1.11). MCLOX was incepted earlier than RLBAX: MCLOX (32 years) vs RLBAX (24 years). MCLOX (1.94) is less costly to investors than RLBAX (1.32). MCLOX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 130.00 vs. RLBAX (50.00). RLBAX has a lower initial minimum investment than MCLOX: RLBAX (250) vs MCLOX (1000). RLBAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.83 vs. MCLOX (9.74). RLBAX return over 5 years is better than : 29.29 vs. MCLOX (-1.61).
| MCLOX | RLBAX | MCLOX / RLBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.91 | 1.32 | 145% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.94 | 1.32 | 147% |
| Fund Existence | 32 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.522 | 8.151 | 80% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 17.2B | 288B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.87 | 1.11 | 168% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.74 | 10.83 | 90% |
| Returns for 3 years | 21.60 | 36.15 | 60% |
| Returns for 5 years | -1.61 | 29.29 | -5% |
| Returns for 10 years | 15.00 | 72.32 | 21% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement