Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MCNVX vs PACIX
MCNVX vs PACIX Comparison
Open Charts MCNVX vs PACIX
NYLI MacKay Convertible
Price$20.68
Change+$0.08 (+0.39%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.62B
Columbia Convertible Securities A
Price$24.32
Change+$0.07 (+0.29%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.19B
MCNVX vs PACIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MCNVX vs. PACIX commentary
Sep 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MCNVX is a Hold and PACIX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MCNVX has more cash in the bank: 1.62B vs. PACIX (1.19B). MCNVX pays higher dividends than PACIX: MCNVX (3.25) vs PACIX (1.74). MCNVX was incepted earlier than PACIX: MCNVX (17 years) vs PACIX (38 years). PACIX (1.15) is less costly to investors than MCNVX (0.69). PACIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 108.00 vs. MCNVX (35.00). PACIX has a lower initial minimum investment than MCNVX: PACIX (2000) vs MCNVX (1000000). MCNVX IRA initial investment is lower compared to PACIX: MCNVX (5000000) vs PACIX (1000). PACIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 20.05 vs. MCNVX (13.26). MCNVX return over 5 years is better than : 12.72 vs. PACIX (2.72).
| MCNVX | PACIX | MCNVX / PACIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.61 | 1.08 | 56% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 1.15 | 60% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 38 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.422 | 12.580 | 91% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2000 | 50,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 5000000 | 1000 | 500,000% |
| Net Assets | 1.62B | 1.19B | 136% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.25 | 1.74 | 186% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.26 | 20.05 | 66% |
| Returns for 3 years | 21.71 | 28.65 | 76% |
| Returns for 5 years | 12.72 | 2.72 | 468% |
| Returns for 10 years | 50.34 | 64.69 | 78% |