Ad is loading...
MCNVX vs PACIX
MCNVX vs PACIX Comparison
Open Charts MCNVX vs PACIX
NYLI MacKay Convertible
Price$18.76
Change-$0.01 (-0.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.48B
Columbia Convertible Securities A
Price$21.77
Change+$0.01 (+0.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.11B
MCNVX vs PACIX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MCNVX vs. PACIX commentary
May 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MCNVX is a Hold and PACIX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MCNVX has more cash in the bank: 1.48B vs. PACIX (1.11B). MCNVX pays higher dividends than PACIX: MCNVX (3.50) vs PACIX (1.91). MCNVX was incepted earlier than PACIX: MCNVX (16 years) vs PACIX (38 years). PACIX (1.16) is less costly to investors than MCNVX (0.69). PACIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 72.00 vs. MCNVX (35.00). PACIX has a lower initial minimum investment than MCNVX: PACIX (2000) vs MCNVX (1000000). MCNVX IRA initial investment is lower compared to PACIX: MCNVX (5000000) vs PACIX (1000). PACIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.34 vs. MCNVX (4.89). MCNVX return over 5 years is better than : 17.15 vs. PACIX (9.21).
| MCNVX | PACIX | MCNVX / PACIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.61 | 1.08 | 56% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 1.16 | 59% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 38 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.679 | 0.586 | 116% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2000 | 50,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 5000000 | 1000 | 500,000% |
| Net Assets | 1.48B | 1.11B | 133% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.50 | 1.91 | 183% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.89 | 9.34 | 52% |
| Returns for 3 years | 14.76 | 11.83 | 125% |
| Returns for 5 years | 17.15 | 9.21 | 186% |
| Returns for 10 years | 29.69 | 36.03 | 82% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...