Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MCNVX vs PACIX
MCNVX vs PACIX Comparison
Open Charts MCNVX vs PACIX
MCNVX vs PACIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MCNVX vs. PACIX commentary
Sep 09, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MCNVX is a Hold and PACIX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MCNVX has more cash in the bank: 1.88B vs. PACIX (1.74B). MCNVX pays higher dividends than PACIX: MCNVX (2.19) vs PACIX (1.30). MCNVX was incepted earlier than PACIX: MCNVX (18 years) vs PACIX (39 years). PACIX (1.15) is less costly to investors than MCNVX (0.68). PACIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 212.00 vs. MCNVX (40.00). PACIX has a lower initial minimum investment than MCNVX: PACIX (2000) vs MCNVX (1000000). MCNVX IRA initial investment is lower compared to PACIX: MCNVX (5000000) vs PACIX (1000). PACIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 21.95 vs. MCNVX (17.16). PACIX return over 5 years is better than : 8.76 vs. MCNVX (6.25).
| MCNVX | PACIX | MCNVX / PACIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.61 | 1.09 | 56% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 1.15 | 59% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 39 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.320 | 15.145 | 121% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2000 | 50,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 5000000 | 1000 | 500,000% |
| Net Assets | 1.88B | 1.74B | 108% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.19 | 1.30 | 168% |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.16 | 21.95 | 78% |
| Returns for 3 years | 40.86 | 57.32 | 71% |
| Returns for 5 years | 6.25 | 8.76 | 71% |
| Returns for 10 years | 72.25 | 102.90 | 70% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement