MCO
Price
$500.28
Change
-$11.34 (-2.22%)
Updated
Feb 21 closing price
Capitalization
71.91B
67 days until earnings call
MQBKY
Price
$144.60
Change
-$4.57 (-3.06%)
Updated
Feb 21 closing price
Capitalization
45.69B
Ad is loading...

MCO vs MQBKY

Header iconMCO vs MQBKY Comparison
Open Charts MCO vs MQBKYBanner chart's image
Moody's
Price$500.28
Change-$11.34 (-2.22%)
Volume$1.35M
Capitalization71.91B
Macquarie Group
Price$144.60
Change-$4.57 (-3.06%)
Volume$10.66K
Capitalization45.69B
MCO vs MQBKY Comparison Chart
Loading...
MCO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MQBKY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MCO vs. MQBKY commentary
Feb 23, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MCO is a Hold and MQBKY is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 23, 2025
Stock price -- (MCO: $500.28 vs. MQBKY: $144.60)
Brand notoriety: MCO and MQBKY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Banks/Brokers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MCO: 187% vs. MQBKY: 77%
Market capitalization -- MCO: $71.91B vs. MQBKY: $45.69B
MCO [@Investment Banks/Brokers] is valued at $71.91B. MQBKY’s [@Investment Banks/Brokers] market capitalization is $45.69B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry ranges from $928.5B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry is $11.67B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MCO’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileMQBKY’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • MCO’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • MQBKY’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, MCO is a better buy in the long-term than MQBKY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MCO’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MQBKY’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MCO’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • MQBKY’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MQBKY is a better buy in the short-term than MCO.

Price Growth

MCO (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а -4.31% price change this week, while MQBKY (@Investment Banks/Brokers) price change was -4.74% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was -2.51%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.26%, and the average quarterly price growth was +28.87%.

Reported Earning Dates

MCO is expected to report earnings on May 01, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Banks/Brokers (-2.51% weekly)

These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MCO($71.9B) has a higher market cap than MQBKY($45.7B). MCO has higher P/E ratio than MQBKY: MCO (45.12) vs MQBKY (13.26). MQBKY (5.888) and MCO (5.685) have similar YTD gains . MQBKY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 14.8B vs. MCO (2.49B). MCO has less debt than MQBKY: MCO (7.27B) vs MQBKY (245B). MQBKY has higher revenues than MCO: MQBKY (6.56B) vs MCO (5.73B).
MCOMQBKYMCO / MQBKY
Capitalization71.9B45.7B157%
EBITDA2.49B14.8B17%
Gain YTD5.6855.88897%
P/E Ratio45.1213.26340%
Revenue5.73B6.56B87%
Total CashN/A87.8B-
Total Debt7.27B245B3%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MCO vs MQBKY: Fundamental Ratings
MCO
MQBKY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8550
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
94
Overvalued
73
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2125
SMR RATING
1..100
187
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3155
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4924
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MQBKY's Valuation (73) in the null industry is in the same range as MCO (94) in the Financial Publishing Or Services industry. This means that MQBKY’s stock grew similarly to MCO’s over the last 12 months.

MCO's Profit vs Risk Rating (21) in the Financial Publishing Or Services industry is in the same range as MQBKY (25) in the null industry. This means that MCO’s stock grew similarly to MQBKY’s over the last 12 months.

MQBKY's SMR Rating (7) in the null industry is in the same range as MCO (18) in the Financial Publishing Or Services industry. This means that MQBKY’s stock grew similarly to MCO’s over the last 12 months.

MCO's Price Growth Rating (31) in the Financial Publishing Or Services industry is in the same range as MQBKY (55) in the null industry. This means that MCO’s stock grew similarly to MQBKY’s over the last 12 months.

MQBKY's P/E Growth Rating (24) in the null industry is in the same range as MCO (49) in the Financial Publishing Or Services industry. This means that MQBKY’s stock grew similarly to MCO’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MCOMQBKY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
49%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
47%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
44%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
44%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
47%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
47%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
59%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
53%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
55%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
66%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
48%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
53%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
43%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
52%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
65%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
MCO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MQBKY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GTDFX33.86N/A
N/A
Invesco EQV Emerging Markets All Cap R6
LZFIX8.76-0.06
-0.68%
Lazard Equity Franchise Inst Shr
MPGFX172.37-3.21
-1.83%
Mairs & Power Growth
DTCAX18.43-0.43
-2.28%
BNY Mellon Sust US Equity A
RYVIX223.39-7.04
-3.06%
Rydex Energy Services Inv

MCO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MCO has been closely correlated with SPGI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MCO jumps, then SPGI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MCO
1D Price
Change %
MCO100%
-2.22%
SPGI - MCO
79%
Closely correlated
-0.38%
MORN - MCO
55%
Loosely correlated
-1.37%
NDAQ - MCO
53%
Loosely correlated
-1.78%
ICE - MCO
51%
Loosely correlated
+0.65%
JEF - MCO
43%
Loosely correlated
-1.69%
More

MQBKY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MQBKY has been loosely correlated with ASXFY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 46% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MQBKY jumps, then ASXFY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MQBKY
1D Price
Change %
MQBKY100%
-3.06%
ASXFY - MQBKY
46%
Loosely correlated
-2.89%
MCO - MQBKY
43%
Loosely correlated
-2.22%
MC - MQBKY
41%
Loosely correlated
-3.11%
EVR - MQBKY
39%
Loosely correlated
-2.67%
PIPR - MQBKY
39%
Loosely correlated
-3.14%
More