Ad is loading...
MCSCX vs NRGEX
MCSCX vs NRGEX Comparison
Open Charts MCSCX vs NRGEX
Neuberger Berman Genesis E
Price$57.99
Change+$4.71 (+8.84%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets8.04B
MCSCX vs NRGEX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NRGEX has more cash in the bank: 8.04B vs. MCSCX (9.81M). NRGEX pays higher dividends than MCSCX: NRGEX (0.57) vs MCSCX (0.06). MCSCX was incepted earlier than NRGEX: MCSCX (2 years) vs NRGEX (3 years). MCSCX (5.00) is less costly to investors than NRGEX (0.69). MCSCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 19.00 vs. NRGEX (13.00). NRGEX has a lower initial minimum investment than MCSCX: NRGEX (0) vs MCSCX (10000). NRGEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -16.13 vs. MCSCX (-17.45).
| MCSCX | NRGEX | MCSCX / NRGEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.99 | 0.03 | 3,300% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 5.00 | 0.69 | 725% |
| Fund Existence | 2 years | 3 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -20.490 | -18.681 | 110% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 10000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 9.81M | 8.04B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.06 | 0.57 | 11% |
| Returns for 1 year | -17.45 | -16.13 | 108% |
| Returns for 3 years | N/A | -15.43 | - |
| Returns for 5 years | N/A | N/A | - |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...