Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MCSDX vs RWMFX
MCSDX vs RWMFX Comparison
Open Charts MCSDX vs RWMFX
MCSDX vs RWMFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMFX has more cash in the bank: 218B vs. MCSDX (344M). RWMFX pays higher dividends than MCSDX: RWMFX (1.40) vs MCSDX (0.67). MCSDX was incepted earlier than RWMFX: MCSDX (5 years) vs RWMFX (24 years). MCSDX (0.60) is less costly to investors than RWMFX (0.31). RWMFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 29.00 vs. MCSDX (15.00). MCSDX has a lower initial minimum investment than RWMFX: MCSDX (0) vs RWMFX (250). RWMFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.95 vs. MCSDX (-4.18). RWMFX return over 5 years is better than : 30.68 vs. MCSDX (17.76).
| MCSDX | RWMFX | MCSDX / RWMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.60 | 0.31 | 194% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.60 | 0.31 | 194% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.835 | 2.544 | 72% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 344M | 218B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.67 | 1.40 | 48% |
| Returns for 1 year | -4.18 | 8.95 | -47% |
| Returns for 3 years | 22.02 | 29.50 | 75% |
| Returns for 5 years | 17.76 | 30.68 | 58% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 82.24 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement