Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MCSMX vs TRCLX
MCSMX vs TRCLX Comparison
Open Charts MCSMX vs TRCLX
Matthews China Small Companies
Price$10.87
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets66.26M
T. Rowe Price China Evolution Equity I
Price$12.54
Change+$0.12 (+0.97%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets52.39M
MCSMX vs TRCLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MCSMX has more cash in the bank: 66.3M vs. TRCLX (52.4M). TRCLX pays higher dividends than MCSMX: TRCLX (1.56) vs MCSMX (1.14). MCSMX was incepted earlier than TRCLX: MCSMX (14 years) vs TRCLX (6 years). TRCLX (2.10) is less costly to investors than MCSMX (1.61). TRCLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 82.40 vs. MCSMX (54.39). MCSMX has a lower initial minimum investment than TRCLX: MCSMX (2500) vs TRCLX (500000). MCSMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 35.34 vs. TRCLX (29.03). TRCLX return over 5 years is better than : -8.27 vs. MCSMX (-45.89).
| MCSMX | TRCLX | MCSMX / TRCLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.40 | 1.03 | 136% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.61 | 2.10 | 77% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 19.714 | 17.614 | 112% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 500000 | 1% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 66.3M | 52.4M | 127% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.14 | 1.56 | 73% |
| Returns for 1 year | 35.34 | 29.03 | 122% |
| Returns for 3 years | -7.89 | 7.38 | -107% |
| Returns for 5 years | -45.89 | -8.27 | 555% |
| Returns for 10 years | 25.11 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement