Ad is loading...
MCSMX vs TRCLX
MCSMX vs TRCLX Comparison
Open Charts MCSMX vs TRCLX
Matthews China Small Companies
Price$9.20
Change+$0.03 (+0.33%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
T. Rowe Price China Evolution Equity I
Price$10.40
Change-$0.18 (-1.70%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
MCSMX vs TRCLX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MCSMX has more cash in the bank: 72.7M vs. TRCLX (45.8M). TRCLX (2.49) and MCSMX (2.41) have matching dividends . MCSMX was incepted earlier than TRCLX: MCSMX (14 years) vs TRCLX (5 years). MCSMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 59.05 vs. TRCLX (54.60). MCSMX has a lower initial minimum investment than TRCLX: MCSMX (2500) vs TRCLX (500000). TRCLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.34 vs. MCSMX (5.99). TRCLX return over 5 years is better than : 7.08 vs. MCSMX (-23.61).
| MCSMX | TRCLX | MCSMX / TRCLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 5 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.793 | 9.269 | 30% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 500000 | 1% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 72.7M | 45.8M | 159% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.41 | 2.49 | 97% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.99 | 14.34 | 42% |
| Returns for 3 years | -41.16 | -30.72 | 134% |
| Returns for 5 years | -23.61 | 7.08 | -334% |
| Returns for 10 years | 9.97 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers