Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MCSMX vs TRCLX
MCSMX vs TRCLX Comparison
Open Charts MCSMX vs TRCLX
Matthews China Small Companies
Price$9.54
Change+$0.01 (+0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets65.66M
T. Rowe Price China Evolution Equity I
Price$11.17
Change+$0.06 (+0.54%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets43.23M
MCSMX vs TRCLX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MCSMX has more cash in the bank: 65.7M vs. TRCLX (43.2M). TRCLX pays higher dividends than MCSMX: TRCLX (1.69) vs MCSMX (1.28). MCSMX was incepted earlier than TRCLX: MCSMX (14 years) vs TRCLX (5 years). TRCLX (2.10) is less costly to investors than MCSMX (1.61). TRCLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 82.40 vs. MCSMX (54.39). MCSMX has a lower initial minimum investment than TRCLX: MCSMX (2500) vs TRCLX (500000). MCSMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.90 vs. TRCLX (3.77). TRCLX return over 5 years is better than : -3.55 vs. MCSMX (-43.91).
| MCSMX | TRCLX | MCSMX / TRCLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.40 | 1.03 | 136% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.61 | 2.10 | 77% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 5 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.956 | 5.208 | 95% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 500000 | 1% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 65.7M | 43.2M | 152% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.28 | 1.69 | 76% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.90 | 3.77 | 157% |
| Returns for 3 years | -17.93 | -5.16 | 347% |
| Returns for 5 years | -43.91 | -3.55 | 1,236% |
| Returns for 10 years | -7.36 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers