Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MCSMX vs TRCLX
MCSMX vs TRCLX Comparison
Open Charts MCSMX vs TRCLX
Matthews China Small Companies
Price$10.61
Change+$0.13 (+1.24%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets62.28M
T. Rowe Price China Evolution Equity I
Price$12.06
Change+$0.10 (+0.84%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets50.29M
MCSMX vs TRCLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MCSMX has more cash in the bank: 62.3M vs. TRCLX (50.3M). TRCLX pays higher dividends than MCSMX: TRCLX (1.61) vs MCSMX (1.22). MCSMX was incepted earlier than TRCLX: MCSMX (14 years) vs TRCLX (6 years). TRCLX (2.10) is less costly to investors than MCSMX (1.61). TRCLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 82.40 vs. MCSMX (54.39). MCSMX has a lower initial minimum investment than TRCLX: MCSMX (2500) vs TRCLX (500000). MCSMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 24.95 vs. TRCLX (17.42). TRCLX return over 5 years is better than : -4.37 vs. MCSMX (-43.43).
| MCSMX | TRCLX | MCSMX / TRCLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.40 | 1.03 | 136% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.61 | 2.10 | 77% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.418 | 13.258 | 116% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 500000 | 1% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 62.3M | 50.3M | 124% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.22 | 1.61 | 76% |
| Returns for 1 year | 24.95 | 17.42 | 143% |
| Returns for 3 years | -10.91 | -0.13 | 8,357% |
| Returns for 5 years | -43.43 | -4.37 | 994% |
| Returns for 10 years | 10.62 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement