Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MCSMX vs TRCLX
MCSMX vs TRCLX Comparison
Open Charts MCSMX vs TRCLX
Matthews China Small Companies
Price$12.19
Change-$0.07 (-0.57%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets72.74M
T. Rowe Price China Evolution Equity I
Price$14.05
Change-$0.09 (-0.64%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets66.37M
MCSMX vs TRCLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MCSMX vs. TRCLX commentary
Oct 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MCSMX is a Hold and TRCLX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MCSMX has more cash in the bank: 72.7M vs. TRCLX (66.4M). TRCLX pays higher dividends than MCSMX: TRCLX (1.34) vs MCSMX (1.01). MCSMX was incepted earlier than TRCLX: MCSMX (14 years) vs TRCLX (6 years). TRCLX (2.10) is less costly to investors than MCSMX (1.61). TRCLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 82.40 vs. MCSMX (54.39). MCSMX has a lower initial minimum investment than TRCLX: MCSMX (2500) vs TRCLX (500000). MCSMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.00 vs. TRCLX (12.64). TRCLX return over 5 years is better than : 1.91 vs. MCSMX (-38.63).
| MCSMX | TRCLX | MCSMX / TRCLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.40 | 1.03 | 136% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.61 | 2.10 | 77% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 35.022 | 33.902 | 103% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 500000 | 1% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 72.7M | 66.4M | 109% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.01 | 1.34 | 75% |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.00 | 12.64 | 134% |
| Returns for 3 years | 27.41 | 34.85 | 79% |
| Returns for 5 years | -38.63 | 1.91 | -2,025% |
| Returns for 10 years | 51.34 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement