Ad is loading...
MCSMX vs TRCLX
MCSMX vs TRCLX Comparison
Open Charts MCSMX vs TRCLX
Matthews China Small Companies
Price$8.72
Change+$0.39 (+4.68%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets65.66M
T. Rowe Price China Evolution Equity I
Price$10.33
Change+$0.57 (+5.84%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets39.87M
MCSMX vs TRCLX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MCSMX has more cash in the bank: 65.7M vs. TRCLX (39.9M). TRCLX pays higher dividends than MCSMX: TRCLX (1.68) vs MCSMX (1.25). MCSMX was incepted earlier than TRCLX: MCSMX (14 years) vs TRCLX (5 years). TRCLX (2.10) is less costly to investors than MCSMX (1.40). TRCLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 82.40 vs. MCSMX (59.05). MCSMX has a lower initial minimum investment than TRCLX: MCSMX (2500) vs TRCLX (500000). TRCLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -3.81 vs. MCSMX (-6.20). TRCLX return over 5 years is better than : -1.96 vs. MCSMX (-40.69).
| MCSMX | TRCLX | MCSMX / TRCLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.40 | 1.03 | 136% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.40 | 2.10 | 67% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 5 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -8.260 | -7.576 | 109% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 500000 | 1% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 65.7M | 39.9M | 165% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.25 | 1.68 | 74% |
| Returns for 1 year | -6.20 | -3.81 | 163% |
| Returns for 3 years | -32.03 | -18.88 | 170% |
| Returns for 5 years | -40.69 | -1.96 | 2,079% |
| Returns for 10 years | -12.49 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...