Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MCSMX vs TRCLX
MCSMX vs TRCLX Comparison
Open Charts MCSMX vs TRCLX
MCSMX vs TRCLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MCSMX vs. TRCLX commentary
Jun 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MCSMX is a Buy and TRCLX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRCLX has more cash in the bank: 107M vs. MCSMX (97.6M). MCSMX pays higher dividends than TRCLX: MCSMX (1.57) vs TRCLX (1.26). MCSMX was incepted earlier than TRCLX: MCSMX (15 years) vs TRCLX (6 years). TRCLX (1.73) is less costly to investors than MCSMX (1.57). TRCLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 104.10 vs. MCSMX (36.83). MCSMX has a lower initial minimum investment than TRCLX: MCSMX (2500) vs TRCLX (500000). MCSMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 71.62 vs. TRCLX (66.01). TRCLX return over 5 years is better than : 5.30 vs. MCSMX (-17.38).
| MCSMX | TRCLX | MCSMX / TRCLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.40 | 1.03 | 136% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.57 | 1.73 | 91% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 39.948 | 28.905 | 138% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 500000 | 1% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 97.6M | 107M | 91% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.57 | 1.26 | 125% |
| Returns for 1 year | 71.62 | 66.01 | 109% |
| Returns for 3 years | 74.65 | 77.43 | 96% |
| Returns for 5 years | -17.38 | 5.30 | -328% |
| Returns for 10 years | 113.85 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers