Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MCSMX vs TRCLX
MCSMX vs TRCLX Comparison
Open Charts MCSMX vs TRCLX
MCSMX vs TRCLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MCSMX vs. TRCLX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MCSMX is a Hold and TRCLX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRCLX has more cash in the bank: 106M vs. MCSMX (83M). MCSMX pays higher dividends than TRCLX: MCSMX (1.77) vs TRCLX (1.27). MCSMX was incepted earlier than TRCLX: MCSMX (15 years) vs TRCLX (7 years). TRCLX (1.73) is less costly to investors than MCSMX (1.57). TRCLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 104.10 vs. MCSMX (36.83). MCSMX has a lower initial minimum investment than TRCLX: MCSMX (2500) vs TRCLX (500000). TRCLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 29.52 vs. MCSMX (18.24). TRCLX return over 5 years is better than : 4.98 vs. MCSMX (-28.12).
| MCSMX | TRCLX | MCSMX / TRCLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.40 | 1.03 | 136% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.57 | 1.73 | 91% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 20.367 | 23.887 | 85% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 500000 | 1% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 83M | 106M | 78% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.77 | 1.27 | 139% |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.24 | 29.52 | 62% |
| Returns for 3 years | 44.57 | 74.03 | 60% |
| Returns for 5 years | -28.12 | 4.98 | -565% |
| Returns for 10 years | 68.52 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement